Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

‘Old-school’ Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney deleted years’ worth of cell phone text messages

The mayor, a public official for decades, had for more than two years been deleting texts on his personal phone. His staff says he didn’t realize he may have destroyed public records.

Mayor Jim Kenney talks on his phone as he surveys the damage at Mount Carmel Cemetery in February 2017.
Mayor Jim Kenney talks on his phone as he surveys the damage at Mount Carmel Cemetery in February 2017.Read moreDavid Swanson / File Photograph

July was a busy month for Mayor Jim Kenney.

He navigated two big controversies — the decision to evict, then reinstate the Made in America concert on the Ben Franklin Parkway and the nonrenewal of the city’s data-sharing contract with federal immigration authorities. A massive water-main break in Center City shut down streets for weeks. And Philadelphia’s first-term mayor went on his first international trade mission.

But residents might never get a complete picture of how Kenney managed the city during those testing times. He deleted all text messages on his phone for the month of July. As he had, it turns out, during the months and years that preceded it.

The mayor, who has long eschewed a city-issued cell phone in favor of his personal cell phone, “wasn’t aware that he needed to retain texts on his personal device,” according to his spokesperson, Deana Gamble. “He habitually deletes items on his phone to clear space.”

Habit or not, the move may violate state open records laws. Any communication — electronic or paper — as it relates to city business is subject to the state’s Right-to-Know Law and considered a public record. And those records are intended to be preserved to help citizens see and understand how public officials govern and tax dollars are spent.

Alex Abdo, an open records expert and advocate, called the mayor’s deletion of text messages “extremely troubling.”

“That’s three years’ worth of Philadelphia history gone,” said Abdo, a senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute.

Daniel Bevarly, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition, said public officials are increasingly using private cell phones as a way to circumvent open records laws. “The use of private phones, it’s just something to get around open government laws," he said in an interview Friday. “They will say, ‘Well, I didn’t know.’ Well, they need to be better trained in open records laws.”

Gamble said the mayor’s staff weren’t aware he was deleting his text messages until the Inquirer and Daily News filed a Right-to-Know request in August that asked for Kenney’s emails and text messages as they related to city business in July.

After months of providing batches of July emails — which suggested that the mayor barely uses email to discuss city matters — the administration late last month acknowledged it could not fill the text-message request because the mayor erased them.

Gamble said that by the time the newspapers’ request came in, the mayor had already deleted his July text messages and he had not backed them up to his iPhone’s Cloud.

“As an elected official, he knows emails and all that can’t be deleted. If he had a city-issued device he would know he couldn’t delete anything," Gamble said. "But he didn’t want to have two devices, so he only uses his personal cell phone.”

And though Kenney, like most officials, often carts his phone with him and is routinely seen texting in public, she said the mayor doesn’t use text messaging as his primary form of government communication. He mostly talks to people in person or on phone calls and gets briefing books every morning with the day’s talking points, agenda, and notes, she said.

“He’s old-school. He’s 60 years old,” Gamble said.

Still, courts have previously ruled that the same standards for open records should apply to private email and cell phone accounts if used for government business. In 2015, the Commonwealth Court said: “If this Court allowed [c]ouncil members to conduct business through personal email accounts to evade the RTKL, the law would serve no function and would result in all public officials conducting public business via personal email.”

Since 1992, the city has had a records retention policy that calls for the preservation of records “regardless of physical form or characteristics” and “in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation as evidence of … activities of the City.” Records have to be retained for a specific number of years depending on the subject or department. Some have to be kept permanently.

The city’s current record retention schedule states that, regardless of format, all general correspondence and subject files within the Executive Office of the Mayor’s Office should be permanently retained.

Gamble said that since the Inquirer’s request, Kenney has been advised to not delete any more text messages. She added that the city’s Law Department is looking at what other cities do and trying to come up with a policy specific to text-message retention.

Erik Arneson, director of the state’s Office of Open Records, said there isn’t case law specific to text messages, but a good records retention policy makes it easy for citizens and taxpayers "to review what is done in the name of public business.” He added: ”I don’t think records retention policy should try to subvert that in any way.”

The Inquirer has filed an appeal with his office over Kenney’s text messages, asking it to ensure that the mayor’s office made “a good-faith effort” to retrieve the July messages, including contacting the mayor’s cell phone carrier to search for the deleted texts.

Abdo said that the issue of elected officials using private cell phones for government business isn’t unique to Philadelphia.

“It’s increasingly common,” Abdo said of the fight over records on a politician’s private device. “I don’t think many agencies or many state governments have adequately dealt with the problem.”