It had to happen.
The Penn State story is now part of the campaign for state attorney general with candidates staking out differing views on the handling of the child-sex scandal.
The Harrisburg Patriot-News plays the dispute across the top of page 1 Thursday and the candidates positions perfectly reflect the mostly partisan stands we've heard since Sandusky was arrested last November.
Republican David Freed, district attorney of Cumberland County, praises the state investigation which began under fellow Republican and then-AG Tom Corbett.
Democrat Kathleen Kane, a former Lackawanna County prosecutor, contends it was wrong to use a grand jury to go after Sandusky because it slowed the case and potentially endangered more children.
"I specialized in the prosecution of sexual assault," Kane told the newspaper. "I've learned that while it's essential to gather the facts and build a case, there must be an urgency to the investigation so that alleged child predators aren't allowed to remain on the streets, putting more children at risk."
Said Freed, "The facts confirm a cover-up at the highest levels of the university — the responsibility of which lies with the administrators of the university, not the hard-working investigators. Criminal investigations are difficult and painstaking endeavors. These challenges are dramatically compounded when a crime is willfully and extensively concealed and covered up."
And so it goes.
Kane says if elected she'll thoroughly examine the handling of the case.
Corbett has repeatedly defended the probe on grounds that bringing charges too soon with insufficient evidence to show a pattern of behaviour puts a successful prosecution at risk.
He also vehemently denies politics had a role in the speed of the investigation. He was running for governor and prosecuting top lawmakers at the same time.