A couple weeks back, we told you about a proposal from state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler) to require photo ID from voters at the polls. John Micek reports that the bill could come up for a House vote as soon as tomorrow. State Democrats are up in arms:

The bill is a "solution in search of a problem," Rep Babette Josephs of Philadelphia said of the legislation ...

[snip]

In brief remarks, Rep. Greg Vitali, D-Delaware, said his staff consulted with the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing and had only found four instances of voter misrepresentation in the 2004-2010 election cycles. Roughly 19.5 million ballots were cast in those elections, Vitali said.

We think Josephs is actually too kind to this bill. It's not just a solution in search of a problem, it also threatens to exacerbate two existing problems: Voter turnout, especially among the poor, and money woes. The Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center estimates that the various cost of implementing this bill, including providing IDs and conducting a voter education campaign, would add up to about $11 million.

Folks in the comments of our last item on this issue argued that an absence of documented cases of voter fraud doesn't mean fraud doesn't exist; maybe offenders weren't caught. That's fair as far as it goes. But here's where it doesn't go: Introducing a costly new requirement that might lead to lower voter turnout. Seems you'd want to at least investigate the problem further before you did that.

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.