Red lights generate green
WASHINGTON - One out of every five Americans lives in a community that pays a for-profit company to install and operate cameras that record traffic violations. A pro-consumer group says that that practice could end up putting profits ahead of safety and accuracy.
WASHINGTON -
One out of every five Americans lives in a community that pays a for-profit company to install and operate cameras that record traffic violations. A pro-consumer group says that that practice could end up putting profits ahead of safety and accuracy.
Some contracts require cities to share revenue with camera vendors on a per-ticket basis or through other formulas as a percentage of revenue. Suffolk County, N.Y., for example, diverts half the revenue from its red-light camera program to its vendor, according to the report being released today by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.
Another type of agreement - conditional "cost-neutral" contracts - also contains provisions that link payments to the number of tickets issued, although the payments are capped, the report said. Under these contracts, local governments pay a monthly fee to a camera vendor. If ticket revenues fail to cover the vendor's fee in any given month, cities may delay payments. That gives vendors "an incentive to ensure a minimum [number] of citations are issued," the report said.
As many as 700 communities, with a combined total of more than 60 million people, outsource their street and highway camera systems, the report found.