Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard
Link copied to clipboard

Best move can appear to be weakest

MANY PROS BELIEVE that aggressive poker is the way to go in no-limit hold 'em. By betting out, you put pressure on your opponents to have a hand or risk making a big mistake.

MANY PROS BELIEVE that aggressive poker is the way to go in no-limit hold 'em. By betting out, you put pressure on your opponents to have a hand or risk making a big mistake.

But sometimes, when you have a read on your opponent and you have position, your strongest move is the one that appears to be the weakest. This strategy can be particularly profitable in a deep-stack tournament such as the World Poker Tour's $15,000-buy-in Five Diamond World Poker Classic at Las Vegas' Bellagio in 2006, where players started with $30,000 in chips.

With blinds at a modest $100-$200, accomplished pro Ted Forrest limped from early position, as did two other players. Daniel Negreanu, one of the few players to own a World Poker Tour title and World Series of Poker bracelet, also limped from late position with 2-5 of clubs. Both blinds came in as well, so six players saw a flop of 10-2-2, two diamonds.

After two checks, Forrest bet $700. Two players called. The action was on Negreanu, who held trip deuces.

"It's unlikely that he has a flush draw, but he could have one," Negreanu said. "But he also could have pocket 10s or A-2. Those are possible. I'm just letting him do the pushing and see what happens."

Negreanu called and the blinds folded, so four players saw an offsuit 4 on the turn. Forrest bet about half the $4,000 pot. The next two players folded.

"I didn't see much of a reason to raise," Negreanu said. "Plus, at the same time, by smooth-calling quickly, I'll make it look like I have a draw, so maybe he'll try to bluff me on the river. If he's on a draw and he thinks I'm on a draw, he might bluff on the river and try to rob me. So, I just call it, playing really meek."

The river came: an offsuit 8. Still playing aggressively, Forrest bet out $2,500.

"At this point in a tournament like this, there's no point in raising," Negreanu said. "If I raise, he's not going to call me unless he's going to crush me, and if I do raise him and he moves all in, what am I going to do then? Call him and go broke? No, I'll probably have to fold. So, if he's bluffing, I figure I'll just call and take it."

Which is exactly what happened.

"It's a situation where a lot of amateurs would've overplayed their hands by raising on the flop, raising on the turn, raising on the river, and [they] would've exposed themselves in case Ted had a good hand and might've lost a lot more," said Negreanu, who interacts on the Full Contact Poker site.

"What I did was make the most by risking the least. I never exposed myself at any point. I controlled the pot size with position by just calling him. I'm still getting paid because he's betting for me, and he bluffed the river, whereas he wouldn't have if I had raised him on the turn. So, I maximized it by playing cautiously."

*

Send e-mail to srosenbloom@ tribune.com.