Skip to content

Trump administration says it will restart asylum and immigration processing

The move comes after a federal judge in Rhode Island last week struck down a suite of policies aimed at restricting legal immigration.

An officer with Enforcement and Removal Operations, part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, stands in an immigration court hallway at Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan, May 26, 2026. The Trump administration said on Friday, June 12, 2026, that it would comply with a court order to restart processing asylum and other immigration applications filed by a broad swath of people who had been left in legal limbo for months.
An officer with Enforcement and Removal Operations, part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, stands in an immigration court hallway at Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan, May 26, 2026. The Trump administration said on Friday, June 12, 2026, that it would comply with a court order to restart processing asylum and other immigration applications filed by a broad swath of people who had been left in legal limbo for months. Read moreMADISON SWART / New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration said Friday that it would comply with a court order to restart processing asylum and other immigration applications filed by a broad swath of people who had been left in legal limbo for months.

The move comes after a federal judge in Rhode Island last week struck down a suite of policies imposed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a major blow to the administration’s expanding efforts to restrict legal immigration. The policies included a global hold on asylum applications filed with the agency and a freeze on immigration applications filed by people from 39 countries, largely in Africa and the Middle East, that are subject to President Donald Trump’s travel ban.

More than 1 million applications had ground to a halt as a result, preventing many people from obtaining green cards, citizenship, and other immigration benefits. The halt also disrupted people’s ability to legally work and left them waiting indefinitely for decisions on their applications.

In a court filing Friday, Angelica Alfonso-Royals, deputy director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the agency instructed employees to treat the policies “as if they are no longer in effect.” The agency also said in a memo posted on its website that it “strongly disagrees with the court’s order” but that it would “follow its terms pending possible further judicial review.”

As of Friday evening, it was unclear whether the agency had restarted making immigration application decisions. Also on Friday, the administration filed an appeal with the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to pause the decision.

The response came after Judge John J. McConnell Jr. rebuked the Trump administration for failing to immediately comply with the order he issued last week.

The administration argued in a filing Tuesday that the initial order by McConnell, an appointee of President Barack Obama, was preliminary and therefore had not “become effective,” indicating that the department had yet to resume making application decisions.

In response, McConnell quickly entered his judgment Thursday, ordering the government in blunt terms not to stall any further.

“There is no excuse this time,” he wrote. “The government has an obligation to immediately comply with this order.”

McConnell gave the administration until Friday evening to file an update “advising the court as to what specific steps it has taken to comply.”

Democracy Forward, the legal organization representing the assorted unions and immigration aid groups, had accused the government of playing procedural games to deliberately dodge last week’s court order.

“The Trump-Vance administration’s cruel immigration policies have been about chaos, confusion, and inefficiency, and we are proud to challenge these unlawful measures and to have secured a court order blocking the policies,” Skye Perryman, the organization’s president, said in a statement. “The federal government cannot shut down lawful immigration pathways or discriminate against people based on where they come from.”

The policies at the center of the case were issued in November after authorities said an Afghan national had shot two National Guard members in Washington. The man, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, has pleaded not guilty.

In his searing 135-page opinion last week, McConnell wrote that the policies effectively made it impossible for many people to remain in the country and that they were improperly fueled by “anti-immigration sentiments.”

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.