Skip to content
Business
Link copied to clipboard

Malpractice changes are under discussion

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration and key congressional Democrats are taking a hard look at the nation's medical malpractice system as part of a broader health care overhaul.

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration and key congressional Democrats are taking a hard look at the nation's medical malpractice system as part of a broader health care overhaul.

"It's an essential piece for there to be enduring reform - reform that will stick and will get a significant bipartisan vote in the United States Senate," said Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), who has a bipartisan health bill that includes incentives to get states to enact malpractice reforms.

Reviving the issue could provoke a fierce fight from trial lawyers, who, along with doctors, have the most at stake in suits for medical malpractice.

Already the trial lawyers' lobby is preparing to distribute a brief on Capitol Hill casting malpractice as a small cost in the overall health system. Also, the brief, citing an Institute of Medicine finding, says as many as 98,000 deaths in the U.S. each year result from medical error.

Trial lawyers and their Democratic Senate allies helped kill attempts under the Bush administration to cap lawsuit payments for punitive damages and pain and suffering in malpractice lawsuits. The Congressional Budget Office says such caps could save the federal government $4.3 billion from 2010-2019.

While capping judgments probably remains a nonstarter in the debate, many top Democrats and administration officials say something must be done to curb medical malpractice costs to help pay for revamping the nation's $2.4 trillion health system.

President Obama told business leaders last week that ideas to save money like "medical liability issues - I think all those things have to be on the table."

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.) cites costs including fast-rising medical malpractice insurance premiums and so-called defensive medicine, whereby doctors prescribe treatments that may be unnecessary to guard against getting sued if they fail to do so.

There's agreement from some in the House, including Rep. Rob Andrews (D., N.J.), who chairs an Education and Labor health subcommittee.

"It's hard for me to imagine a result that gets to the president's desk that doesn't deal with the medical malpractice issue in some way," Andrews, from Camden County, said in an interview yesterday.

Proposed solutions include alternative dispute resolution, similar to legislation that Obama co-sponsored with Hillary Rodham Clinton when both were in the Senate in 2005. Their bill would have created a program to allow patients to learn of medical errors and establish negotiated compensation with the offer of an apology.

Baucus has proposed giving states grants to develop alternate litigation, such as "health courts" whose judges have health care expertise.

Both lawyers and doctors say they're open to alternative dispute ideas.