Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Businesses await action on equipment deduction

Some small-business owners are on edge as they wait to see whether Congress will approve a big increase in the tax break they get to buy new equipment.

Some small-business owners are on edge as they wait to see whether Congress will approve a big increase in the tax break they get to buy new equipment.

The so-called Section 179 deduction, aimed at helping small businesses grow, is caught up in a debate over a number of tax provisions. Lawmakers are haggling over whether to raise the $25,000 deduction to $500,000 for the current tax year only, or to make the higher level permanent for future years.

If they can't agree, the deduction stays at the lower amount.

Congress had hoped to wrap up a $1.1 trillion spending bill that includes the Section 179 deduction by midnight Friday. But completion of that bill was delayed until this week.

Which has left small-business owners like Vicki and Charles Phaneuf in limbo. The couple want to purchase $30,000 in chairs for their Raleigh, N.C., party company, CE Rental. But if Congress doesn't approve an increase in the deduction, they won't be able to afford them.

The Phaneufs already have used up the $25,000 deduction on a truck and other equipment.

"It's delayed our making any purchases that weren't absolutely necessary," Vicki Paneuf said.

The Section 179 deduction, named for a provision in the federal tax law, allows a small business to deduct up front the entire cost of equipment ranging from computers to furniture to vehicles and machinery.

The base deduction is $25,000, but lawmakers vote every year whether to increase that amount for the current year.

Before the recession, the deduction was predictable: It rose to keep up with inflation. Congress set it at $250,000 for 2008, to stimulate the economy during the recession, and kept it there for 2009.

Congress raised it to $500,000 for each of the next five years, but often lawmakers didn't approve the larger deduction until December. The House passed a bill early this year calling for the higher deduction, but it stalled in the Senate.

Not being able to predict the size of the deduction from one year to the next makes it difficult for a small business to plan. Many companies rely on their tax savings to fund their growth because it's hard for them to get bank loans, said Lawrence Nannis, a certified public accountant in Waltham, Mass.

Many also have money set aside for taxes in case they don't get the big deduction, and that's money they can't use to buy equipment.

The owners of Hobby Works, a chain of four stores in Maryland and Virginia, want to open more locations but have been stymied because they can't plan ahead, co-owner Mike Brey says.

Even if the deduction for 2015 does turn out to be $500,000, he can't buy all of the necessary showcases to outfit them by the end of the year - the tax law requires equipment to be delivered and in use by Dec. 31 to qualify for the deduction.

And he can't start a search for a location unless he knows he'll get the tax break. "You can't wake up in the morning and say, 'I'm going to open a store tomorrow,' " Brey says.

Small businesses that sell equipment also are affected.

Sales at St. Joseph's Equipment in LaCrosse, Wis., are down 15 percent to 20 percent this year, and chief financial officer Sherry Wuebben says the uncertainty about the Section 179 deduction has kept farmers from buying.

"If they had known [a $500,000 deduction] was coming, they would have been visiting us," Wuebben said. Her company's equipment includes tractors, combines, and threshers whose costs range from $25,000 to $500,000.

"I've been getting calls asking, 'Is anything going to happen?' " said Cynthia Kay, a vice chairwoman of the National Small Business Association and owner of a media production company based in Grand Rapids, Mich.

In her own business, Kay said, she has already bought a $20,000 computer server and cameras that run between $15,000 and $20,000 apiece.

"If I don't make some bold moves," she said, "the business is going to be at a disadvantage."