Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Controller trashes solar-compactor deal

Sees plenty of waste in city's BigBelly contract

The BigBelly solar trash bin as introduced in the city in 2009. But the city's controller says they are a waste of money. ( Bonnie Weller / Staff Photographer)
The BigBelly solar trash bin as introduced in the city in 2009. But the city's controller says they are a waste of money. ( Bonnie Weller / Staff Photographer)Read more

THE CITY might have been better off keeping its old $100 wire trash baskets - and throwing away the contract to buy 710 new solar-powered trash compactors.

That's according to the City Controller's Office, which released a report yesterday claiming the BigBelly compactors aren't as good a deal as city and company officials promised, and that contracting rules were broken.

The purchase of 500 compactors and 210 recycling units for more than $2.1 million from BigBelly Solar - or about $3,700 each - were meant to reduce collection costs by 70 percent.

A report from BigBelly cited by the city before the purchase said that the compactors would reduce the number of weekly collections from 17 to five.

But City Controller Alan Butkovitz said that his office monitored BigBelly compactor collections in March and April, and found that compactor collections averaged 10 a week.

And instead of the promised one-man crew to make five collections per week, Deputy City Controller Harvey Rice said, two people were needed for the 10 collections.

In a letter to Butkovitz, Streets Department Commissioner Clarena Tolson said that the compactors have allowed the city to eliminate 24 positions and cut collection from seven to five days per week.

"There is no question in my mind that the BigBelly compactor program has saved taxpayer money, increased recycling and made for cleaner communities," she wrote.

The controller's report said that the city could have saved $200,000 or more by purchasing the units from a distributor, rather than directly from the manufacturer.

He said that the $2.1 million single-source contract was authorized because BigBelly, based in Needham, Mass., misinformed the city that it was the only company able to sell the solar compactors. Butkovitz said that distributors "had the power and capacity to sell these items directly to the city."

"The city relied solely on the claims of BigBelly Solar without any other verification," Butkovitz said. "This is a highly questionable business practice, especially when dealing with a company that has never handled a contract of this magnitude."

Richard Kennelly, vice president of marketing for BigBelly, said that the report was "riddled with inaccuracies" about BigBelly and its deal with Philadelphia, but he declined to elaborate.

Kennelly said that the solar trash-compactor manufacturer has been working with large customers for years. He said that no distributor was authorized to sell to the city at the time the contract was signed.

Butkovitz's report claims that BigBelly Solar's chief executive officer admitted that a letter sent to the city stating that the company was the only source able to sell the compactors was incorrect.

But the CEO later "denied that the letter was a material misrepresentation" because he believed that a private distributor was aware that BigBelly was pursuing the Philadelphia account.

Butkovitz said that his office would ask the city solicitor to seek renegotiation of the contract and a refund, but would not yet utilize an option to stop payments to the company. "We can't determine to what extent it was just an error, to what extent it was more willful than that," Butkovitz said.

The compactors got solid reviews from residents in an unscientific poll by the Daily News earlier this year.

"Honestly I think they've been a real boon to the street," said architect Jim Campbell, a member of the South Street West Business Association. "They seem to be working well. There seems to be less stuff outside them. We're very happy."