Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

5 big questions after the bombshell about Donald Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer

As usual, the White House leaves us with more questions than answers.

The White House has a whole new Russia headache on its hands after Donald Trump Jr. on Sunday acknowledged he met in June 2016 with a Kremlin-tied lawyer who was pitching opposition research on Hillary Clinton.

The president's son isn't apologizing for the meeting, and the White House as a whole is taking its usually defiant tone about the whole thing. But that may prove difficult for a whole host of reasons.

Below are a number of questions – perhaps starting with Monday's White House briefing.

1) Why is seeking opposition research from a Kremlin-backed lawyer not a Very Bad Thing – in and of itself?

Let's set aside, for the moment, the fact that this meeting has been kept secret for so long. And let's also set aside, for the moment, the fact that the White House has regularly denied contact with Russians and any form of collusion.

Why is this OK?

Isolated from all these other factors, this was three people very close to the then-presumptive Republican presidential nominee – Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort – granting a meeting with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin for the purposes of opposition research.

Trump Jr. and the White House have repeatedly argued that nothing came of the meeting and that it turned out the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, didn't actually have useful information. But why does that even matter? Wasn't the intent to accept such information from a Russian national with suspect ties? And how is that different from the propaganda effort Russia engaged in during the 2016 campaign that is the subject of investigations?

Basically: Does the White House believe that it's actually OK to allow foreign nationals to influence American elections in this way?

Which brings us to . . .

2) Were there other similar contacts with Russians (or other foreign nationals)?

Was this an isolated incident, or did the Trump campaign officials engage in this kind of thing regularly? The fact that they took this meeting and they aren't apologizing for it suggests they may have been open to other, similar entreaties. So were there any?

We now know they were in the market for this brand of help. At this point, the White House should make sure it doesn't have any other such meetings or conversations with Russians.

3) What specific information was this Kremlin-tied lawyer pitching?

Given the meeting is now public and Trump Jr. insists the information was not useful, it would behoove him to tell us what Veselnitskaya was selling. That's really the only way to be sure that this information was not acted upon – that a foreign national with ties to the Kremlin didn't actually successfully meddle in the campaign with the Trump campaign's assistance.

Trump Jr. and the White House seem insistent that this information was a bust; so prove it. Their denials about contacts with Russians keep unraveling. The burden of proof is now very much on them.

4) How did President Trump not know about this?

Trump Jr. said his father "knew nothing of the meeting or these events." But again, this was three people who were closer to him and to the campaign than just about anybody else: His son, his son-in-law who is now a senior White House adviser, and the guy who was then running the campaign.

This meeting was seen as significant enough for all three of them to make a point to attend, and yet nobody shared details of the meeting with the guy whose campaign they were acting as members of? President Trump is going to have to address this.

5) Why has the White House failed to get its story straight on so many occasions? Has nobody done a forensic review?

We may one day reach a point where we can say that there was no collusion or anything untoward happening between the Russians and the Trump campaign. But if that's the case, the White House has only fueled this story with its long string of tardy disclosures and contradictory denials.

The question is why? Why are we still learning about meetings between Trump associates and the Russians months after this issue first blew up in their face with the Michael Flynn situation? Why hasn't anybody done a forensic accounting of every single possible meeting between a member of the Trump team and Russians like Veselnitskaya?

When you are treading water in situations like these, the best strategy is generally to get all the bad news out at once, and to understand the truth so you don't keep getting caught in falsehoods that make it look like you have something to hide.

There are basically two options for the White House officials here: They are trying to hide something, or they are completely derelict in dealing with – and getting out in front of – all of this.

Everything is happening so fast — or at least that's how it feels trying to follow politics these days. You've seen the headlines about President Trump and his policies — but what do they mean for Philadelphia? What does that mean for you? We've launched a newsletter to explore just that. You can sign up to get the weekly Trumpadelphia newsletter in your inbox every Tuesday.