Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

DN Editorial: More for DROP enrollees

SINCE THE STATE Legislature did the right thing by banning elected officials from entering a much-derided deferred retirement program, we were looking forward to not having the program to kick around anymore; we were resigned to simply wait for the six members of Council who signed onto the program to go away with their payouts.

SINCE THE STATE Legislature did the right thing by banning elected officials from entering a much-derided deferred retirement program, we were looking forward to not having the program to kick around anymore; we were resigned to simply wait for the six members of Council who signed onto the program to go away with their payouts.

But a legal loophole reported in the Daily News would allow six City Council members who signed up for the Deferred Retirement Option Plan to get a boost to their pension should they run for and win re-election.

The DROP program is supposed to freeze pension payments while a participant is still working, but Council members serving additional four-year terms can accrue pension credits and build higher pensions; they can also take advantage of cost-of-living increases.

Few believe that elected officials should be entitled to enroll in DROP; unfortunately, one of those is a former city solicitor who wrote the opinion that gave electeds the OK. That was backed up by the current city solicitor. Neither opinion has been challenged in court. It's a mystery as to why not. Would somone please take on this court challenge? An entire city - minus six - will thank you. *