Puerto Rico was already in trouble after suffering a "lost decade" without economic growth after 2005, leading to a default on its public debt and mass migration from the island. That was before it got hit with Hurricane Maria, followed by criminally inadequate relief and reconstruction funds. Now some of those funds might actually end up with its creditors, compounding the outrage that the remaining residents must suffer.
To make matters worse, the Harvard study attributes thousands of deaths to delayed medical care. Many of these deaths were avoidable, an outrage that made many Puerto Ricans feel like they were being treated as second-class citizens.
But their troubles were just beginning. With an unsustainable debt burden, the island's finances had been handed over to a Fiscal Management and Oversight Board that was appointed by Congress. Prior to the storm, the board had certified a 10-year austerity plan that would lead to another lost decade of economic growth.
In the months after Maria, some federal support started to trickle in and appropriations from Congress increased. Even President Trump declared the island's public debt to be "unpayable." The situation prompted a review of the board's fiscal plan, in order to account for the island's post-hurricane reality.
When the review process started, the board released a set of "core principles" that promised a plan that would provide sufficient relief and focus on rebuilding the island. A number of prominent economists, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, signed a letter warning of the devastating effects that a return to austerity would have for Puerto Rico's people and its economy.
Yet, as my colleague Jake Johnston and I show in a new report, the board's new post-hurricane fiscal plan takes the same path of demanding more austerity, including sharp cuts for most government services. Government agencies are also expected to implement a series of layoffs, restrict labor rights, and cut public sector pensions across the board. The measures mandated by the board would directly hurt a large number of Puerto Ricans already struggling to recover.
Even more shocking, the plan puts aside funds for a fiscal surplus that may be available for creditors to claim. The surplus would be about $6.1 billion over six fiscal years actually higher than the $4.5 billion surplus that was predicted before the storm hit.
Puerto Rico needs an estimated $95 billion to rebuild, but is due to receive just $54 billion from the federal government, and about $8 billion from private insurers. The increase in the surplus is not due to Puerto Rico's having too much money, but rather to the board's seeming willingness to prioritize creditors' interests over relief efforts.
One place where austerity was not considered was for the board itself. The plan set aside a whopping $1.5 billion to cover its expenses and professional fees. The board's executive director has an annual salary of $625,000, topped with very generous benefits. This type of lavish spending is especially distasteful coming from an unelected body that's mandating sharp cuts for the island's residents.
Meanwhile, as our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico suffer, the Wall Street Journal has named Puerto Rican bonds the investment of the year. Bond prices ticked up after news of the projected surplus reached creditors, some of which were vulture funds who bought the bonds at a steep discount, hoping to cash in at full value.
This is too much. Congress and the federal government cannot continue to destroy what is left of Puerto Rico's economy, and drive more of the population from the island (over 10 percent have already left over the past decade). The federal authorities must arrange for debt cancellation and sufficient reconstruction not austerity so that Puerto Rico can return to economic growth.