After a rural Kentucky family suffered an unspeakable gun tragedy late last month, that sad story, unfortunately, became new fuel for the scorching debate over gun control. When 5-year-old Kristian Sparks shot his 2-year-old sister with a rifle he had been given as a gift, opposing factions either defended rural America's gun culture or denounced it.
Having grown up in the Deep South's gun culture, I feel nothing but sympathy for the Sparks family. One child is dead; another will be scarred for life. And Caroline Sparks is just one of many: The careless handling of guns sends Americans to their graves with mind-numbing frequency.
Indeed, in the days since she died, other children have been wounded or killed in accidental shootings. According to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, an average of eight Americans under the age of 20 are killed by firearms every day. While urban children are more likely to be homicide victims, Brady says, rural children are more likely to be suicides or victims of accidental shootings.
But the mindless political punches and counter-punches do little to curb the death toll. If concerned grown-ups really want to save children from accidental gun discharges, we ought to separate those gun accidents from the broader debate over gun control.
Instead, let's discuss this as a child-safety issue. There are plenty of precedents in American cultural history for focusing on child safety even if it impinges on the convenience of adults. One of the best examples is the decades-long crusade to make child-safety seats a familiar part of child care.
That doesn't mean it will be easy to bring some commonsense child-safety measures to routine gun use. Too many factions are eager to keep any discussion of guns locked into a doctrinaire set of talking points. And, of course, the National Rifle Association will have no use for even the mildest reforms.
For years, the NRA has insisted that children ought to be armed for sport shooting right alongside their parents; it offers firearms safety courses to protect them from injury. However, while safety courses are a good idea, they are no substitute for age-appropriate gun handling, adult supervision, or safe storage of firearms.
The availability of firearms courses may have lured some parents into believing that preschool- or elementary-aged children can handle weapons prudently without supervision. That's just ridiculous.
To reinforce that, we need a crusade on the proper supervision of young sport shooters, as well as safe storage of weapons when they are not in use. Adults who fail in their responsibilities, allowing children to be hurt or killed, should face criminal sanctions.
That won't be an easy cultural shift: In homes already facing a tragedy, local law-enforcement officials will be reluctant to press charges. While national efforts to reinforce the shift can help, the best results will come from persistent and courageous efforts by local leaders, including state legislators, police, prosecutors, and physicians.
My own father was a nut about gun safety - my brother didn't get his first rifle until he was about 11, and he was closely supervised - but Dad's conscientiousness didn't extend to all my relatives. When I was 11, I picked up a loaded handgun off a bedside table at an uncle's house and aimed it at my brother, then 2. I thought it was a toy.
I don't know why I didn't pull the trigger. My brother was saved by fate or caprice or the grace of God. Too many children don't get that lucky.