A reminder: you're getting this email because you signed up for a newsletter about President Trump and his administration's effect on Philadelphia. This is the second edition, and you can email me here with suggestions/questions/fawning compliments/angry rants/etc. If someone forwarded this to you and you're liking what you're reading, you can sign up to get it every week here. Onward!
The president returned from his trip to the Middle East, the Vatican and the G7 summit with a lot on his plate back home. He set himself a deadline on whether the U.S. will withdraw from the Paris climate accords. His son-in-law and closest adviser, Jared Kushner, is reportedly now under scrutiny in the Russia investigation. And now he's got a budget to sell.
Trump's most detailed federal budget proposal yet came out last week, and outlines cuts for nearly every domestic agency outside of the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, some of which we've already written about. The president's latest proposal, though, includes a slew of previously-unannounced cuts to social services programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as food stamps). Those cuts could hit Philly, the poorest big city in the country, particularly hard.
Some 480,000 people in Philadelphia — including 182,000 children — get SNAP benefits. Under Trump's budget, the feds would cut SNAP by 25 percent over the next 10 years. The budget would expand work requirements for SNAP beneficiaries — which proponents say are aimed at getting more people back to work. It would also save federal money by making states pick up some of the tab for SNAP costs.
The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning Washington think tank, estimated that under the president's plan, Pennsylvania would be paying an extra $680 million a year for SNAP by 2023. (The more conservative Cato Institute, which advocates for entirely state-run food stamp programs, applauded the cuts for "paring back the bloated welfare state"). Local anti-hunger advocates, in a state that already has a $1.2 billion budget deficit, worry that would only mean more cuts.
"Not only are the feds walking away from their financial responsibility, but they're passing the buck on tough decisions — the states will decide how to trim benefits and limit eligibility," Kathy Fisher, the policy director at Philly's Coalition Against Hunger, told me. "It makes advocates crazy — you're not only fighting at the federal level for adequate funding, but there's a battle at the state level, too."
Presidential budgets never make it through Congress unchanged. Democrats reacted to this one with outrage, and Republicans were lukewarm at best. (PA's own Republican Sen. Pat Toomey said he agreed with the plan's broad goals but not some of its particulars.) But while this budget, as a whole, is basically dead in the water, it does act as a handy breakdown of what the Trump administration thinks the country should be spending money on — and Republicans share a lot of those priorities. So don't write it off just yet.
"The violent attacks in Portland on Friday are unacceptable. The victims were standing up to hate and intolerance. Our prayers are w/ them." — President Trump, on his @POTUS Twitter account, commenting on a white supremacist who murdered two men in Portland. The tweet, sent Monday, was not retweeted to his personal account, which has 12.8 million more followers.
"We Europeans truly have to take our fate into our own hands." — German chancellor Angela Merkel, on her country's alliance with the U.S. and Britain, after meeting with President Trump and other world leaders at the G7 summit.
"My handshake with [President Trump] was not innocent." — French president Emmanuel Macron, on the Death Grip Felt Round the Internet.