Feds rest case against Dix 5
Jury may get case by next week
Federal prosecutors in Camden yesterday rested their case against five men accused of planning to kill American soldiers at Fort Dix, after 25 days of presenting evidence.
Defense attorneys said that they would call only a few witnesses today, clearing the way for closing arguments to begin early next week. Deliberations could begin as early as Dec. 16.
The defendants are not expected to testify.
The suspects - five foreign-born Muslim men who spent years living in Cherry Hill - face charges including attempted murder and conspiracy to kill military personnel. If convicted, they could be sentenced to life in prison.
No plot was carried out before the men - Mohamad Shnewer, Serdar Tatar and brothers Dritan, Eljvir and Shain Duka - were arrested in May 2007. All were in their 20s at the time.
Attorneys for the men say that their clients had not been seriously planning anything but were portrayed as terrorists by two paid government witnesses, whose testimony dominated the trial.
U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler told jurors that they would be sequestered during deliberations.
Prosecutors have tried to convince jurors that the defendants were working on an attack that could have been one of the most devastating examples of homegrown terrorism in the United States.
Yesterday, they called terrorism expert Evan Coleman as their final witness. Coleman told jurors that the jihadist - referring to holy war - propaganda videos found on computers belonging to two of the men have been found on the computers of terrorists around the world, calling them "some of the classics."
Coleman said the fact that the men also tried to buy guns and engaged in what the government calls "training" bolster the likelihood that they were planning to strike. He said the haphazard way the men seemed to act - goofing off at firing ranges and never meeting to discuss details of an attack - didn't mean they were not going to carry one out.
"It doesn't take a lot of sophistication to kill people," Coleman told jurors. "Ultimately, it comes down to interest. It doesn't take a lot of thought to create chaos."
On cross-examination, Coleman conceded that the presence of the videos did not prove that the men were willing to engage in terrorism and acknowledged that there was no evidence that some of the suspects saw all of the videos or heard all of the jihadist audio recordings. *