Abortion funds are in the spotlight with the end of Roe v. Wade – 3 findings about what they do

As soon as the Supreme Court handed down its ruling that signaled the end of legal abortion in much of the country, calls for donations to abortion funds immediately rang out.

There are at least 90 of these funds – donor-funded nonprofits that are often staffed by volunteers that help people obtain abortions they can’t afford by reducing the cost and assisting with travel, lodging and other services.

Before the ruling on June 24, abortion was already inaccessible in many cases because of restrictive laws in such states as Texas and Mississippi that have left many counties with no abortion clinics at all. Even in states such as Pennsylvania, where abortion is not restricted by gestational age, people often struggle to access abortion care because the procedure can be expensive, isn’t covered by insurance in most cases, and comes on top of other costs, such as travel, lodging and child care.

» READ MORE: Pa. abortion providers are bracing for a surge in patients if Roe v. Wade is overturned

Abortion funds generally partner with providers to help cover some out-of-pocket procedural costs on behalf of the patient, and some funds cover associated expenses such as travel, child care and lodging for overnight stays.

As a social work professor who studies reproductive health care, I have led research that reviewed thousands of case records of patients who requested assistance from abortion funds to help pay for a procedure that they could not afford.

Here are three main findings from the studies I’ve conducted so far:

About 20% of the people aided by these funds were 11 to 19 years old, according to studies I led based on national data collected from 2010-2015. In contrast, only 14% of all people getting abortions are in that age group.

As is the case for all patients who have abortions, more than half of the people getting help from the abortion funds we studied were in their 20s. Only 18% of them were in their 30s, versus 25% of all patients. And we determined that 50% of abortion fund recipients were Black, though they account for just 36% of abortion patients.

Nearly 60% of patients aided by abortion funds have children. About 41% have one or two children, as opposed to 46% of all people who got abortions, and 18% of abortion fund patients had three or or more children, versus 14% overall.

These findings suggest that younger parents of color were disproportionately affected by abortion barriers during this period.

My research team found that abortion funds didn’t cover the full cost for patients, or even the entire gap between the cost and what they could afford.

Patients typically requested help to pay for a procedure they expected to cost more than $2,200, when patients could only pay an average of $535. Abortion funds, in turn, were able to pledge an average of $256 on behalf of each patient.

We also determined that abortion costs were highest for patients age 11-13, at just over an average of $4,000. Those patients had an average of only $616 to pay those bills, and they received an average pledge of $414.

I also participated in another project that analyzed more detailed data collected from 2001 to 2015 from an abortion fund operating in Florida. These patients faced an average procedural cost of almost $1,000 and received $140 in aid from the fund, on average.

When patients have trouble paying for an abortion, it can delay the procedure. That, in turn, tends to make it even more expensive.

Patients seeking help from abortion funds face many obstacles besides paying medical bills that make it hard for them to get the care they were seeking. Another study I led found that the typical abortion fund patient faced two of these barriers.

Common challenges included juggling their parental responsibilities with finding the time and the means to travel long distances to a provider — including when mandatory waiting periods require multiple visits. Patients also dealt with unemployment or underemployment and unstable housing.

For full-time students, it could be hard to schedule appointments that would not interfere with their studies.

The National Network of Abortion Funds, an umbrella group, estimates that abortion funds helped about 56,000 patients in 2019, the most recent data available.

By overturning Roe v. Wade, the justices have left it up to the states to decide whether abortion will be allowed within their borders. Abortion access will likely decline, increasing costs in many places for patients who will have to travel to another state.

Abortion funds, in turn, are likely to get more requests for support. These groups say they plan to respond by helping as many people as they can.

This article is republished from The Conversation. Read the original article here.