A Villanova University Law School professor is skewering New Jersey officials who decided to tax medical marijuana.
James Edward Maule says in his blog, Mauled Again, that the officials should have simply done their homework. Clearly, he said, prescription drugs and over-the-counter drugs are exempted from the state's 7 percent sales tax according to the state's tax law. Medical marijuana should enjoy the same tax break.
NJ officials would argue that medical marijuana is NOT a prescription drug because the feds don't recognize it as legal. Doctors write "authorizations" for patients who qualify to receive marijuana to alleviate pain and nauseau.
"What's the difference? I would guess that the doctor would write this authorization on the same pad that he writes his prescriptions on," Maule says.
NJ officials also go on about how marijuana is not an over-the-counter drug because you can't buy it off a pharmacy shelf and it is not labelled as such.
"Hello?" the good professor asks.
He suggests the officials should keep reading.
Section 54:32B-8.1 of the tax law defines a drug as “a compound, substance or preparation, and any component of a compound..." that is either recognized as a pharmaceutical OR is "intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease" Or "intended to affect the structure or any function of the body."
Maule says medical marijuana sure seems to "fit within the definition of a drug" because the Health Department says it can be used by sick people once their doctors certify it may help mitigate against their cancer, multiple sclerosis or other illnesses.
Then again, he cautions that there may be "some provision tucked away in some obscure place" that could cloud the issue. But he couldn't find any. He also wonders why the legislators didn't simply insert a clause in the bill saying it either is exempt or it is not exempt from a sales tax.