WASHINGTON - Sure your liver or kidney could save someone's life. But would you donate your hands, or your face? Signing up to become an organ donor may get more complicated than just checking a box on your driver's license
The government is preparing to regulate the new field of hand and face transplants like it does standard organ transplants, giving more Americans who are disabled or disfigured by injury, illness, or combat a chance at this radical kind of reconstruction.
Among the first challenges is deciding how people should consent to donate these very visible body parts that could improve someone's quality of life - without deterring them from traditional donation of hearts, lungs, and other internal organs needed to save lives.
"Joe Blow is not going to know that now an organ is defined as also including a hand or a face," said Suzanne McDiarmid, who chairs the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) committee that will develop the new policies over the next few months.
Making that clear to potential donors and their families is critical - "otherwise we could undermine public trust," said McDiarmid, a transplant specialist at the University of California, Los Angeles.
"The consent process for the lifesaving organs should not, must not, be derailed by a consent process for a different kind of organ that the public might think of as being very different from donating a kidney or a heart or a liver," she said.
These so-called reconstructive transplants are experimental and rare. The best estimates are that 27 hand transplants have been performed in the United States, beginning with the 1999 surgery in Louisville, Ky., for Matthew Scott, a Mays Landing, N.J., man who had lost his left hand in a firecracker accident 14 years earlier.
About seven partial or full face transplants have been done since 2008, said Vijay Gorantla, medical director of the University of Pittsburgh reconstructive transplant program.
But they are gradually increasing as more U.S. hospitals offer the complex surgeries, the Defense Department funds research into the approach for wounded veterans, and as transplant recipients go public to say how the surgeries have improved their lives.
"These hands are blessed hands to me," said Lindsay Aronson Ess, 30, of Richmond, Va., who received a double hand and forearm transplant at the University of Pennsylvania in 2011. She had lost her hands and feet to a life-threatening infection in 2007.
Until now, deciding who qualifies for a hand or face transplant, and how to find a match and approach a potential donor's family, all have been done on an informal, case-by-case basis.
There has been no way to tell which hospitals' techniques work best and how patients ultimately fare. There have been reports of two deaths related to face transplants in other countries, and some transplanted hands have had to be amputated. Patients must take lifelong antirejection medications that put them at risk of infections, cancer, and other side effects.
In July, government regulations go into effect making hand and face transplants subject to the same strict oversight by UNOS, which manages the U.S. transplant program, as heart or kidney transplants. They're part of a new definition of organ that includes other body parts doctors one day might transplant - from feet to voice boxes, maybe even the uterus.
Unlike corneas, heart valves, and other simpler tissues that are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, these are all complex mixes of blood vessels, nerves, muscles, and other tissues. And unlike livers and hearts, which are transplanted to save lives, faces and hands are not critical for survival, although recipients do say their lives have been changed.
The rules mean potential recipients will be added to the UNOS network for matching of donated hands and face tissue that are the right tissue type and compatible for skin color, size, gender, and age. Transplants and their outcomes will be tracked.
Before then, the UNOS committee will have to decide such things as who's first on the waiting list and what special expertise a transplant center needs.
Then there's the consent challenge. Some specialists say people should receive a list of body parts when they sign an organ donor card - to specify exactly what they do and don't want donated at death.
"Ethically, it is the right thing to do so the potential donor has a choice," said Pittsburgh's Gorantla, who is closely watching how UNOS tackles the issue.
Until now, next of kin have decided on donating a loved one's face or hands because previously registered organ donors probably had no idea that was an option, said UNOS committee bioethicist Robert Veatch of Georgetown University. Some state laws preclude family survivors from overriding a relative's decision to donate organs or tissues.
"Some people who would be willing to consent to a kidney might get a little squeamish about a face," he said.
The government projected fewer than two dozen people might be placed on a waiting list for hand and face transplants each year. But Susan Stewart of the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations said such transplants ultimately would be more common because finding a match would be easier.
Ess - Penn's hand patient, whose lower legs and lower arms were amputated in 2007 because a bloodstream infection after intestinal surgery nearly killed her - now represents patients on the UNOS committee. She wants to ensure potential recipients are fully informed of the rigors and risks. The regeneration of nerves that restore movement and sensation to the fingers, for example, can take up to two years.