WASHINGTON - Federal authorities have opened a criminal investigation of whether IRS employees broke the law when they targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, the latest setback for an agency that is the subject of withering bipartisan criticism and multiple congressional inquiries.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said Tuesday that the Justice Department and the FBI began the probe after the IRS acknowledged that it selected conservative groups with the words tea party and patriot in their names for special reviews.
"We are examining the facts to see if there were criminal violations," Holder said at a news conference.
Also Tuesday, a widely anticipated report by the IRS's watchdog described the agency's tax-exempt unit - where the screening of conservative groups occurred - as a bureaucratic mess, with some employees ignorant about tax laws, defiant of their supervisors, and blind to the appearance of impropriety.
The report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration described in detail the use of "inappropriate criteria" to screen political advocacy groups. An IRS unit created a "lookout" list for organizations with keywords such as tea party or patriot in their names. Organizations faced months of delays in getting their applications approved.
President Obama on Tuesday called the report's findings "intolerable and inexcusable," adding that he had directed Treasury Secretary Jack Lew "to hold those responsible for these failures accountable, and to make sure that each of the Inspector General's recommendations is implemented quickly, so that such conduct never happens again."
IRS officials told the inspector general that they had used the keywords as shorthand to efficiently manage a deluge of new political advocacy groups, but that explanation was rejected by the inspector general's office.
"Developing and using criteria that focuses on organization names and policy positions instead of the activities . . . does not promote public confidence that tax-exempt laws are being adhered to impartially," said the report, which inspector general J. Russell George issued.
The report did not find evidence that the actions were motivated by partisan interests. IRS officials told investigators they did not consult anyone outside the agency about the screening.
The watchdog report is likely to stoke growing outrage over the agency's actions. No IRS employees involved in the decisions have been disciplined, and one has been promoted, said House Oversight and Government Committee Chairman Darrel Issa (R., Calif.), whose panel prompted the audit.
"We still do not know why the targeting began, how extensive it was, who initiated it, and who knew about it," said Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), a member of the oversight committee. "The IRS must be held accountable to the American people, which requires a full investigation."
In a written response attached to the watchdog report, Joseph Grant, acting commissioner of tax-exempt and government entities at the IRS, conceded that "some errors occurred" but pledged that "significant improvements in this area are in place and we are confident that what transpired here will not recur."
The IRS firestorm began Friday after Lois Lerner, the IRS official who oversees tax-exempt groups, acknowledged and apologized for the targeting at a legal conference. The Justice Department and the FBI began investigating later that day, a Justice official said.
"The investigation is in its early stages, and the department is looking at various laws governing the misconduct of government employees" in either the federal criminal code or the federal tax code, the official said.
David Laufman, a former Justice Department lawyer, said that although there may be a range of administrative actions that could be taken against IRS employees for their conduct, it may be difficult to prosecute them criminally unless they intentionally violated the law.
"Willfulness would not exist where [IRS employees] believed they were acting in good faith or they were negligent in some respect," Laufman said. "For there to be a criminal violation, there will have to be evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that someone at the IRS knowingly and willfully violated the law."
Conservatives pressed for additional action. Daniel Epstein, executive director of Cause of Action, a Washington-based conservative group, wrote to federal prosecutors urging them to convene a grand jury because IRS employees may have "engaged in a conspiracy" to block members of conservative groups from exercising their constitutional rights.
Four committees in both chambers of Congress also are looking into the actions, with the first hearing at the House Ways and Means Committee scheduled for Friday.