Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Monkey see, monkey do ... and do it better

NEW YORK - Think you're smarter than a fifth grader? How about a 5-year-old chimp? Japanese researchers pitted young chimps against human adults in tests of short-term memory, and overall, the chimps won.

NEW YORK - Think you're smarter than a fifth grader? How about a 5-year-old chimp? Japanese researchers pitted young chimps against human adults in tests of short-term memory, and overall, the chimps won.

That challenges the belief of many people, including many scientists, that "humans are superior to chimpanzees in all cognitive functions," said researcher Tetsuro Matsuzawa of Kyoto University.

"No one can imagine that chimpanzees - young chimpanzees at the age of 5 - have a better performance in a memory task than humans," he said in a statement.

Matsuzawa, a pioneer in studying the mental abilities of chimps, said even he was surprised. He and colleague Sana Inoue report the results in today's issue of the journal Current Biology.

One memory test included three 5-year-old chimps who had been taught the order of Arabic numerals 1 through 9, and a dozen human volunteers.

They saw nine numbers displayed on a computer screen. When they touched the first number, the eight others turned into white squares. The test was to touch all these squares in the order of the numbers that used to be there.

Results showed that the chimps, while no more accurate than people, could do this faster. One chimp, Ayumu, did the best. Researchers included him and nine college students in a second test.

This time, five numbers flashed on the screen briefly before they were replaced by white squares. The challenge, again, was to touch the squares in the proper sequence.

When the numbers were displayed for about seven-tenths of a second, Ayumu and the college students were both able to do this correctly about 80 percent of the time.

But when the numbers were displayed for four-tenths or two-tenths of a second, the chimp was the champ. The briefer of the times is too short to allow a look around the screen, and in those tests Ayumu still scored about 80 percent; humans plunged to 40 percent.

That indicates Ayumu was better at taking in the whole pattern of numbers at a glance, the researchers wrote.

What's going on here? Even with six months of training, three students failed to catch up to the three young chimps, Matsuzawa said in an e-mail.

He thinks two factors gave his chimps the edge. For one thing, he believes human ancestors gave up much of this skill over evolutionary time to make room in the brain for gaining language abilities.

The other factor is the youth of Ayumu and his peers. The memory for images that is needed for the tests resembles a skill found in children that dissipates with age. In fact, the young chimps performed better than older chimps in the new study. (Ayumu's mother did even worse than the college students.)

So the next logical step, said Elizabeth Lonsdorf, of the Lincoln Park Zoo, is to fix up Ayumu with some real competition: little kids.

See video clips of the project at the Kyoto Web site via

http://go.philly.com/chimps