ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - President Obama's commitment to scaling back the use of unmanned aircraft to kill suspected terrorists could pave the way for improved relations between the United States and Pakistan, analysts and political leaders said Friday.
But the government here maintained its insistence that the drone campaign does more harm than good and should be shut down completely.
Obama's decision to continue using targeted killings abroad while imposing restrictions that could significantly reduce the frequency of drone strikes comes at a sensitive time for Islamabad, as it prepares for a new civilian government led by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Since winning a May 11 election, Sharif and his aides have been careful in their remarks, declaring opposition to the drone campaign without appearing excessively confrontational to Washington, which Islamabad relies on for billions of dollars in military and economic aid.
One of Sharif's advisers, Sen. Tariq Azeem, called the policy shift outlined by Obama in a major speech Thursday "a positive sign."
"Apart from killing a few al-Qaeda terrorists, drones have caused immense damage to the image of the U.S.," Azeem said Friday. "If President Obama has had a rethink, I think it's a welcome step."
The United States has relied heavily on its drone campaign to take out al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders holed up in Pakistan's tribal regions.
Since Obama took office in January 2009, the United States has carried out 293 drone strikes in northwest Pakistan, according to the Long War Journal website. Several top al-Qaeda leaders have been killed in such strikes in recent years, including the terrorist network's second-in-command, known as Abu Yahya al-Libi, in June 2012.
Privately, commanders in Pakistan's powerful military have acknowledged the utility of drone strikes in taking out top militant commanders and leaders. Under President Asif Ali Zardari's administration, Pakistan maintained a policy of publicly condemning drone strikes while tacitly allowing them.
But the campaign has been one of the primary sources of friction in Washington's tenuous relationship with Islamabad. Pakistanis view it as a blatant violation of their nation's sovereignty and argue it has become a major recruiting tool for militants because of the number of civilians mistakenly killed in the strikes.