Skip to content

The slavery exhibits at the President’s House are starting to be restored by the National Park Service

The restoration is the latest development in the city and community stakeholders’ fight to preserve the President’s House after President Donald Trump’s administration ordered the removal of exhibits.

Workers return the displays to the President’s House site in Independence National Historical Park Thursday, Feb, 19, 2026 after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore the slavery exhibits that the National Park Service removed from the President’s House last month.
Workers return the displays to the President’s House site in Independence National Historical Park Thursday, Feb, 19, 2026 after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore the slavery exhibits that the National Park Service removed from the President’s House last month.Read moreTom Gralish / Staff Photographer

Almost a month after abruptly dismantling exhibits about slavery from the President’s House, National Park Service employees began reinstalling the panels late Thursday morning ahead of a court-imposed deadline.

Just before 11 a.m., four Park Service employees carted glass panels from a white van to a barricaded area at the site. They screwed each panel back into the brick before cleaning the panels with rags.

The restoration is the latest development in the city and community stakeholders’ fight to preserve the President’s House after President Donald Trump’s administration ordered the removal of educational panels from the exhibit on Independence Mall last month.

U.S District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe sided with Mayor Cherelle L. Parker’s administration on Monday, issuing an injunction ordering the government to “immediately” restore the site to its normal condition. On Wednesday, she set a Friday evening deadline.

Just after 12:30 p.m., 14 of the panels had been restored. A couple bystanders clapped as the displays were put back up.

Shortly before noon, Parker arrived to the scene, taking in the newly reinstalled exhibits. She shook hands with and thanked the Park Service employees.

“It’s our honor,” an employee told the mayor.

Parker did not take questions from the media but issued a statement later celebrating the return of the exhibits.

“We know that this is not the end of the legal road,” the mayor said. “We will handle all legal challenges that arise with the same rigor and gravity as we have done thus far.”

Michael Coard, an attorney and leader of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, which helped lead efforts to preserve the President’s House, called Thursday’s reinstallation a “huge victory” after weeks of advocacy in court and around the site itself.

“We had people doing something at least every single day since the vandalism took place on January 22, and we’ve had the attorneys in court, so it’s a great day, but the battle is not over,” Coard said.

On Wednesday, several employees from Independence National Historical Park placed metal barriers around the brick walls where panels had been displayed near the open-air exhibit’s Market Street entrance. One employee said the barriers were so employees could clean the area.

Prior to Thursday, exhibits were being stored in a Park Service storage facility adjacent to the National Constitution Center.

The reinstallation was a moment that Philadelphians who had been tirelessly fighting to protect the President’s House had been waiting for.

On Jan. 22, when park employees took crowbars and wrenches to the President’s House, which memorializes the nine people George Washington enslaved at his Philadelphia residence, the City of Philadelphia filed a suit against members of the Trump administration. Community stakeholders took action to preserve the memory of the site.

“It’s important to hang on to hope,” said Bill Rooney, 68, of Chestnut Hill. “The people who lived here — sometimes that’s all they had to hold on to. We need to do that too and [make] sure that the whole history is told.”

Rooney, a certified tour guide, added: “History matters, all of history matters.”

Rufe, a George W. Bush appointee, issued a blistering 40-page opinion in which she compared the federal government arguments justifying the removal of the interpretive panels to the dystopian Ministry of Truth from George Orwell’s 1984 novel.

The opinion argued it was urgent that the full exhibit be shown to the public. When the federal government didn’t comply 48 hours later, the judge set a deadline of 5 p.m. Friday for the Department of Interior and the National Park Service to fulfill her order.

The Trump administration asked Rufe on Wednesday night for a stay on the injunction while their appeal is pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

The motion says enforcement of the order makes Philadelphia a “backseat driver holding veto power” in all decisions related to Independence Hall National Park. By forcing the government to restore the slavery panels, the court “compels the Government to convey a message that it has chosen not to convey,” the motion says.

The city filed a brief opposing the stay, saying that the federal government did not add anything new to its argument. The idea that the restoration would cause harm was undermined by the fact that the exhibits “stood for 15 years without alteration, conveying the ‘whole, complicated truth,’” the city said. The filing does not acknowledge that some panels were reinstalled.

Rufe didn’t rule on the stay as of Thursday afternoon. But neither the federal government’s appeal to a higher court nor the request for stay pauses Rufe’s order.

Complying with the order could complicate the federal government’s argument that restoring the panel inflicts irreparable harm as they have “turned around and done what they said they couldn’t do,” said Marsha Levick, a visiting chair at the Temple University School of Law.

Coard, of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, said Thursday’s development epitomizes the group’s name. He said his coalition’s advocacy for the President’s House stands on the shoulders of activism from ancestors during the Civil Rights Movement.

“We took that baton from them and we ran with it,” Coard said. “And the interesting thing about taking that baton is that this track was not as difficult for us. They had more obstacles on their track. We have fewer because they cleared it for us.”

This story is developing and will be updated.