Skip to content
Spotlight PA
Link copied to clipboard

Pa. legislature sends $26 billion short-term budget to Gov. Tom Wolf

Lawmakers also approved the use of $2.6 billion in federal stimulus money for a variety of purposes, including relief for counties and long-term care facilities.

The state Senate on Thursday passed the $25 billion budget 44-6, just two days after the House first presented the measure and passed it along party lines.
The state Senate on Thursday passed the $25 billion budget 44-6, just two days after the House first presented the measure and passed it along party lines.Read moreJOSE F. MORENO / Staff Photographer

Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan newsroom powered by The Philadelphia Inquirer in partnership with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and PennLive/Patriot-News. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter.

HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania legislature has sent a short-term budget with no tax increases to Gov. Tom Wolf, an unusual measure made necessary by the strain put on the state’s finances by the coronavirus.

Lawmakers also approved the use of $2.6 billion in federal stimulus money for a variety of purposes, including relief for counties and long-term-care facilities, where thousands of residents have died since the pandemic began.

The state Senate on Thursday passed the $25.8 billion budget by 44-6, just two days after the state House first presented the measure and passed it along party lines.

The stopgap measure flat-funds most state agencies for five months and the Department of Education for one year. That guarantees that schools — which have seen annual funding boosts over the last six years under Wolf — will not see cuts in state funding.

A spokesperson for Wolf said he would sign the measure.

A top Senate Republican said the budget reflects the uncertainty about what the future holds. This week, the state’s Independent Fiscal Office predicted the state will permanently lose $5 billion in revenue through next June, though that analysis assumes no widespread shutdowns in the fall should coronavirus cases peak again.

“What was a promising and improving fiscal picture at the beginning of the current fiscal year for the commonwealth ... has been totally turned on its head,” State Sen. Pat Browne (R., Lehigh), chair of the Appropriations Committee, said on the floor.

Because it’s impossible to predict what Pennsylvania’s finances will look like when the next fiscal year ends, Browne said, “it would not be responsible fiscal policy — on behalf of the taxpaying citizens of this commonwealth — to advance an act consistent with usual practice.”

Democrats in both the House and Senate expressed concern that flat-funding education would lead localities to raise property taxes to account for rising costs.

“If you use last year’s funding, it does not take into consideration any inflation that has occurred,” said State Sen. Andy Dinniman (D., Chester), minority chair of the Education Committee.

John Callahan, the chief advocacy officer for the Pennsylvania School Boards Association, said increases in local taxes are not out of the question.

“Who can say? It’s very different across Pennsylvania,” Callahan said. “Some school districts will need to [raise taxes], some won’t. Some will use their reserves, some school districts don’t have reserves. Some will have to furlough and make program cuts. It is just all dependent on your local circumstances.”

Callahan said that with all the tough decisions the legislature was forced to make given the pandemic’s impact on revenue, he is grateful for the education funding the state’s school districts will receive. He said the decision to fund the Department of Education for the full 12 months is “a huge help” in making decisions on challenging issues.

“We were realizing that the budget is really tight, and it’s really challenging for legislators,” he said.

Mark DiRocco, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators, echoed Callahan’s remarks. He said the decision to fund K-12 schools in this sort of economic climate will go “a long way” to districts to provide services to their students. And with the budget all but decided before June, school districts and municipalities will have a rare opportunity to see the state budget before they pass their local budgets.

Still, school districts aren’t out of the woods.

“I do anticipate some districts will need to raise property taxes if they want to maintain their current level of programming,” DiRocco said.

DiRocco cited increasing costs like pensions, special education services, and charter school tuition — combined with coronavirus-related demands like more hand sanitizer and overtime pay for custodial staff — as the major financial challenges districts will need to face.

State Sen. Vincent Hughes (D., Phila.) said Democrats had to weigh many unknown variables while keeping much-needed public services afloat and taxes flat.

“How do you make decisions, knowing that there is potential major-league help coming from the federal government? You wait and see,” he said. “We could come back when we do part two of the budget [in November] and put more money into education.”

Also Thursday, the legislature swiftly approved a bill that would appropriate $2.6 billion of the $3.9 billion Pennsylvania received from the CARES Act to provide COVID-19 relief.

A spokesperson for Wolf could not comment on whether and when the governor would sign the bill, though lawmakers say the measure represents an agreed-to negotiation.

The 60 Pennsylvania counties that previously didn’t receive stimulus dollars will each get a cut of $625 million, based on population, while hard-hit long-term-care facilities will get $632 million distributed through a variety of formulas.

The measure also appropriates $255 million for small businesses and $175 million to prevent foreclosures or evictions brought on by hardships because of the coronavirus pandemic. Day care centers and other child-care services will receive $116 million.

What the legislature will do with the remaining $1.3 billion remains to be seen. Currently, the money cannot be used to replace lost state and local revenues, though there are hopes that the federal government will make those dollars more flexible.

Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman (R., Centre) said he and other lawmakers are waiting to see if Congress will appropriate dollars specifically for revenue replacement.

“We’re sort of waiting to see, like everybody else,” he told reporters Thursday.

Lawmakers will likely face tougher choices this fall, when much of the temporary budget is set to expire on Nov. 30 — the last day of the legislative session.

Spotlight PA receives funding from nonprofit institutions and readers like you who are committed to investigative journalism that gets results. Give a gift today at