Biden’s Summit for Democracy must examine America’s backsliding at home | Trudy Rubin
Biden wants to focus on competition between democracies and autocracies like China, but the biggest threat to democracy lies with divisions at home.
“No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise,” said Winston Churchill in 1947, leading up to one of his most famous aphorisms: “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”
Churchill was understandably vexed, since he had been recently voted out as prime minister after leading Britain to victory in World War II. Yet the British leader’s sour comment offers a useful framework for President Joe Biden’s virtual Summit for Democracy, which takes place Dec. 9-10. It will bring together leaders from more than 100 governments, along with leaders from civil society and business, to focus on growing challenges facing democracies.
There are many reasons to question the summit’s usefulness. But there is no reason to question Biden’s belief that liberal democracies face their biggest threats since World War II.
“We’re in a contest, not with China per se [but] with autocratic governments around the world as to whether or not democracies can compete with them in a rapidly changing 21st century,” Biden said at a June news conference.
In other words, can democracies that value free elections and individual rights still deliver for the people? Or, contrary to Churchill, can autocratic regimes such as China deliver more to their publics?
Those queries can hardly be resolved amid the cacophony of a massive summit — or in the planned follow-up and second summit a year from now. But at least the questions will be aired.
In fact, the most useful aspect of the summit may be to get the issue of democracy back on the global agenda — and into the public discourse here.
“The liberal West has been in retreat, and advocacy for democracy has been absent,” says Steven Levitsky, coauthor of How Democracy Dies and a Harvard University government professor. “The summit is an initial step to get democracy promotion back on the agenda.”
I hope that means an open debate at the summit about the internal threats to democracy in the United States.
The dangers posed by the GOP’s continued attacks on the basic constitutional principle of free elections should be obvious. They certainly are to our democratic allies abroad, to most Democrats, and to principled Republicans such as Rep. Liz Cheney.
But in a right-wing bubble, where Fox News hosts praise the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, where Donald Trump still campaigns on the Big Lie of a stolen election, and where the GOP tries to ensure minority rule by legal manipulation, truth is turned on its head.
Hopefully, the summit will clarify how America’s image as the (flawed) bastion of global democracy has been tarnished by the GOP’s war on democratic principles. As a November Pew Research poll demonstrates, few people in other developed nations — or in the United States — now view American democracy as a good example for other countries to follow.
Some reasons will become obvious at the meeting next week.
For example, a spotlight might be cast on the GOP fascination with Hungary — a country not invited to the summit because of its increasingly authoritarian leader, Viktor Orbán, who has curtailed political and press rights. He brags that Hungary now has an “illiberal” democracy.
Yet former Vice President Mike Pence recently joined Orbán at a conference on “family values” at which Orbán attacked Western liberalism. Orbán is also a favorite of Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and of Donald Trump.
In fact — as the summit should make clear — the very term democracy is under challenge at home and abroad.
The Chinese and Russian ambassadors, in an astonishing article in the National Interest, attacked the summit for failing to respect their respective “democracies” (neither country was invited). China is a “whole-process socialist democracy” and democracy is the “fundamental principle” of Russia’s political system, according to the ambassadors. Their screed dumped on democratic elections and claimed Chinese and Russian “democracies” were better able to deliver “human progress” to their people.
This is the kind of claim that was easily debunked during the Cold War with the Soviet Union. But given GOP leaders’ fascination with backsliding democracies — and Trump’s bromance with autocrats — it’s not clear whether one of America’s major parties still believes liberal democracy is the best choice.
The Summit for Democracy has at least the potential to make the distinction between liberal democracy and its alternatives. The discussions should also focus on the danger to democracies posed by ugly politics of the kind witnessed daily in our country.
Xi Jinping has made clear he believes democracies are so internally divided they can no longer compete with autocracies, especially China. “He [Xi] is deadly earnest about becoming the most significant, consequential nation in the world,” Biden told reporters. “He and others — autocrats — think that democracy can’t compete in the 21st century with autocracies because it takes too long to get consensus.”
When it comes to the United States, right now Xi looks right on the money — and the fate of our system will reverberate in other democratic countries. “We have to prove democracy still works. That our government still works — and can deliver for the people,” Biden said in March.
The Summit for Democracy could show Americans what they face if our democracy fails.