Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Pa. lawmakers are decreasing violence prevention funding after it got a boost from one-time federal money

Legislators are still increasing their pre-pandemic allocation for the antiviolence grants, for a total of $40 million.

Zair Barnes, 13, shoots hoops at the Mander Playground in Strawberry Mansion last year, before former Gov. Tom Wolf arrived for an event to announces the opening of two violence intervention programs.
Zair Barnes, 13, shoots hoops at the Mander Playground in Strawberry Mansion last year, before former Gov. Tom Wolf arrived for an event to announces the opening of two violence intervention programs.Read moreTOM GRALISH / Staff Photographer

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania lawmakers are decreasing funding for violence prevention programs in the coming year after a one-time infusion of federal funds has run out, despite gun violence continuing to shatter the lives of residents in Philadelphia and other communities.

The state injected $75 million of its federal relief dollars into its existing violence intervention and prevention program last year, for a total of $105 million. Next year, however, lawmakers approved only $40 million for the same grant program.

Since 2018, Pennsylvania has sent tens of millions of dollars each year to nonprofits and community organizations doing antiviolence work. Lawmakers are still increasing their pre-pandemic allocation for the programs, for a total of $40 million.

Gov. Josh Shapiro’s March budget proposal included $105 million in state funding – a boost that would have replaced the federal money. But the $45.5 billion spending plan approved by both the Senate and House included just $40 million for the community antiviolence grants. And that funding can’t be distributed while the state budget remains at an impasse following a controversy over a proposed school voucher program.

Philadelphia, like other big cities nationwide, has seens urging rates of gun violence since 2020. So far this year in Philadelphia, there have been 201 people killed by gun violence and 776 non-fatal shooting victims, which is a 28% decrease from last year, according to data from the city Controller’s Office. While the number of homicides so far this year represent a 21% decline compared to the same date last year, this year’s total is still well above pre-pandemic numbers.

“We are finding out that the shootings are going down,” said state Sen. Vincent Hughes (D., Philadelphia). “There are some very horrible stories and incidents that are occurring, but overall, there is a movement that is going in the right direction with respect to the reduction of violence. These organizations and these communities where the violence is most intense, they deserve investment.”

Last year, the state approved funding for at least 122 programs, with organizations receiving state grants ranging from $10,000 to $2.5 million. For example, Philadelphia Youth Basketball, the Philadelphia Youth Network, and Lighthouse Sports Complex all received more than $1 million in state funding.

Edwin Desamour, the director of Lighthouse Sports Complex, said the funding allowed the North Philly organization to improve its sports fields that host afterschool programs as well as athletic and recreational activities. The group works to provide educational and cultural opportunities to families in North Philadelphia and Kensington.

“The Lighthouse field was almost … not being utilized the way it should be, and it really needed the funding to get that place it should be,” Desamour said. “[The state] funding really was creating an oasis for families who cannot step outside their homes because of the needles or the violence that is going on.”

Nonprofits interested in receiving the grants must apply through the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. Those selected are interviewed by a state panel.

Philadelphia’s city government gives out more than $20 million in a similar antiviolence grant program. However, an Inquirer investigation found that some of the awardees were unable to deliver on their proposals.

For example, the city grant program had funded a group called “Put It Down,” which had no paid staff, no office, no operating budget, and no board of directors but still landed a grant worth more than $700,000. The group failed to deliver on its promises and backed out shortly after receiving the grant, returning the unspent dollars to the city.

Hughes said violence intervention and prevention programs deserve even more funding from the state.

“Our viewpoint is that the way to deal with gun violence and violence in general is not just the law enforcement strategy and not just the prosecution strategy, but also an investment strategy,” Hughes said. “These are organizations that have done good work with the resources provided for them and that continue to need investment to continue their work.”

Correction: This article has been corrected to reflect that after a one-time expenditure of federal funds in the last fiscal year, the state’s antiviolence grant program will receive a decrease in funding. A previous version incorrectly characterized the impact of the approved spending plan on the program’s funding.

Samuel O’Neal is an intern with the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents’ Association.