Skip to content
News
Link copied to clipboard

New Jersey AG: ‘We’re taking on DuPont’ over contamination, PFAS

The attorney general alleged DuPont and Chemours sent harmful chemicals flowing into the air, water, and soil, threatening New Jerseyans' health.

Attorney General Gurbir Grewal and Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Catherine McCabe announce the filing of four lawsuits against DuPont, Chemours, and 3M for contamination on Wednesday, March 20, 2019. (Office of the Attorney General/Tim Larsen)
Attorney General Gurbir Grewal and Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Catherine McCabe announce the filing of four lawsuits against DuPont, Chemours, and 3M for contamination on Wednesday, March 20, 2019. (Office of the Attorney General/Tim Larsen)Read moreHandout (custom credit) / Office of New Jersey Attorney General/Tim Larsen

Two days after New Jersey environmental officials ordered five companies to pay what will likely be hundreds of millions to address chemical contamination caused by the discharge of PFAS compounds, the state’s attorney general sued some of the companies over cleanup.

In two lawsuits filed in Superior Court, the state alleged DuPont and Chemours sent the harmful chemicals flowing into the air, water, and soil, and asked the court to force the companies to pay for investigating and restoring the contaminated sites.

The same companies also discharged other dangerous substances, including lead and mercury, at two sites in Gloucester and Passaic Counties, two additional lawsuits filed Wednesday say.

“They decided to put profit above the safety of New Jersey’s residents, and we won’t stand for it,” Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said at a news conference. “We’re holding polluters accountable for decades of misconduct.”

The various chemicals in question cause cancers and other health issues. Contamination at the sites has affected local residents — and the state alleges DuPont and its spin-off company, Chemours, knew the dangers and did not act. After talks with the state over decades, the companies’ cleanup has been inadequate, officials said.

New Jersey hopes to force payment from the companies for restoring all four sites as well as for damage to natural resources.

Chemours said in a statement Wednesday that the lawsuits “appear to be coming out of left field” and that the company was disappointed.

“Chemours has consistently stepped up to its responsibility and worked cooperatively with state and federal officials regarding any environmental issues at our manufacturing and remediation sites in New Jersey,” a spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement. “[W]e are particularly surprised by this action since DuPont and NJDEP agreed in June 2005 to resolve groundwater natural resource matters in New Jersey.”

DuPont and Chemours representatives said they had not seen the lawsuits early Wednesday afternoon.

“DuPont has worked under the direct oversight of NJDEP and U.S. EPA for more than two decades on remediating soil, sediment, and groundwater both on and offsite at these locations," said Dan Turner, a DuPont spokesperson. "Fulfilling our remediation responsibilities has been and will continue to be a priority for DuPont.”

The state also sued 3M, which was the primary manufacturer of PFAS. In a statement late Wednesday, 3M said it “acted responsibly in connection with PFAS and will vigorously defend its record of environmental stewardship.”

PFAS chemicals — per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — have been found in drinking water, groundwater, and soil near military bases in Bucks and Montgomery Counties and near military facilities and manufacturing plants in New Jersey.

At its Parlin facility in Middlesex County and at Chambers Works in Salem County, DuPont released “massive amounts” of chemicals including PFAS for decades, the attorney general alleged. The Salem County site is “one of the most contaminated sites in New Jersey,” the lawsuit said; DuPont was supposed to be cleaning up.

“[I]t has recently become clear that DuPont has not been working in good faith to address the contamination,” the lawsuit alleges. “Instead, DuPont knowingly concealed the true nature of the chemicals it discharged, while simultaneously moving forward with corporate reorganization” that shifted its PFAS product lines — and liabilities — to Chemours from DuPont.

On Monday, the Department of Environmental Protection directed 3M, DuPont, DowDuPont, Chemours, and Solvay to provide detailed accounts of their use of PFAS chemicals in New Jersey within 21 days. The DEP estimated the companies would be asked to fund hundreds of millions in cleanup costs.

In Gloucester County, DuPont disposed of hazardous waste including TCE, aniline, benzene, and PCBs at its Repauno facility..

And at Pompton Lakes Works, Passaic County, where DuPont manufactured explosives, residents contended with contaminated private drinking wells and compromised air quality due to DuPont’s dumping of lead, mercury, TCE, and PCE.

DuPont and Chemours are remediating the Pompton Lakes site, but, state officials said, “contamination continues to harm the community.”