Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Protesters set up encampment at University City Townhomes in solidarity with displaced residents

“This is residents saying: This ends here. This ends now. This is where we rise up.”

A banner is dropped over sign renaming the University City Townhomes the People’s Townhomes.
A banner is dropped over sign renaming the University City Townhomes the People’s Townhomes.Read moreALEJANDRO A. ALVAREZ / Staff Photographer

An encampment has taken root at the University City Townhomes, a show of solidarity with the West Philadelphia residents facing displacement from the planned sale and redevelopment of the property.

Around a dozen tents are set up on the lawn of the Townhomes, the site of ongoing protests since the sale and demolition of the 2.7-acre affordable housing complex at 40th and Market Streets was announced. As many as 69 primarily Black and Hispanic families are set to be displaced.

Many have lived there for decades, protesters said Monday.

On Saturday, residents invited supporters to set up the encampment, at the end of a daylong rally and party. Tenants and supporters said the encampment would stay as long as the fight continues.

“This is residents saying: This ends here. This ends now. This is where we rise up,” said Melvin Hairston, who has lived at University City Townhomes for 28 years.

On Monday morning, chants of “Housing is a human right” rang out, with supporters donning T-shirts emblazoned with “Save the UC Townhomes.” Protesters draped a sign that read “The People’s Townhomes.”

Last year, IBID Associates, the family partnership that owns the townhomes, announced plans to end its federal affordable housing contract and sell the property. Originally, tenants of the 69 units had until July 8 to move out, but residents now have until Sept. 7 to leave to accommodate the arrival of federal housing vouchers for displaced tenants.

» READ MORE: Owner of West Philly subsidized townhouses plans to sell, displacing dozens of families. It’s an example of the vulnerability of affordable housing.

Several residents on Monday told The Inquirer that IBID has not met with them, sending an intermediary to meetings instead. A spokesperson for IBID said Monday that the owners had been providing tenants with relocation services since last July.

“This does not — I believe — have to go this way,” said Sheldon Davids, a resident of the townhomes for 13 years. “This displacement is going to affect too many people. Have too much follow-up effects for us to take it lightly.”

The townhomes are in the Black Bottom neighborhood, a historically Black neighborhood that has gradually gentrified.

In a statement, the property owners called Monday’s protest and the encampment “ill-advised.”

“The owners of 3900 Market Street are in the process of reviewing the unfortunate and ill-advised decision by a group of protesters to occupy a portion of the premises,” IBID said in a statement. “To be clear, while we respect their right to protest and express their opinions, these individuals are trespassing on private property and have no legal right to assemble on the site or access public utilities there.”

The encampment included people like sisters Jannie and Yolanda Mitchell, who camped out in tents, a symbol, Davids said, of insufficient shelter.

» READ MORE: City and activists reach an agreement to close the homeless encampment outside PHA headquarters in North Philly

“When you start putting people displaced out of homes on the streets, what do you get? Disgruntled individuals walking the community. It becomes a mental-health issue. You might have mothers turn to drugs to try to cope. How do you feed your kids if you don’t have shelter?” said Yolanda Mitchell. “This issue creates 10 different issues that need to be addressed across the board.”

A spokesperson for the city’s Office of Homeless Services said those camping out are “not a homeless encampment — yet.” Often, people who are experiencing homelessness will drift toward protest encampments because they believe the spots will attract food and services that will help them, said Stephanie Sena, a Villanova University professor and expert on homelessness.

She added that several housing activists who were involved in the homeless encampment on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway two years ago appear to be attaching themselves to the West Philadelphia protest.

The University of Pennsylvania, whose campus borders the site and which has at-times contentious relations with the neighboring community, was still formulating a response to the encampment, according to a university official.

» READ MORE: The Parkway homeless encampment is fenced and (nearly) clear

Residents, along with their supporters, were prepared to camp out and fight as long as they needed to, said Hairston.

“They’re trying to move us out with no place to go,” said Hairston, who lives with his 68-year-old mother. “Housing inflation is up. People are on fixed incomes. And they’ve been stripping low-income, affordable housing from these communities of Philadelphia for well over a half a century.”

» READ MORE: Philly’s housing deal with occupants of Parkway homeless encampment seen as ‘unprecedented’ nationwide

Services provided by the property owners included ensuring tenants could secure federal Tenant Protection Vouchers, IBID spokesperson Kevin Feeley said. The vouchers can be used to pay for other affordable housing in Philadelphia and outside the city, the spokesperson said.

But residents like Davids said there’s fear that a shortage of affordable housing means that displaced residents will have nowhere to go, even with vouchers. What little affordable housing is available is often stymied by landlords’ reluctance to accept housing vouchers.

» READ MORE: PHA is offering cash to try to entice landlords to accept tenants using federal housing vouchers

And ultimately, many tenants who have raised children and built lives at the townhomes will now potentially have to uproot everything, said Davids.

“Where are we going to send our kids to school?” he said. “Schools have been already closed around the community. People have had to adjust and find alternative places to send their children to. They’re going to have to do that again. Not only are they going to have do that again, but worse: They have to do that again in a community with which they’re unfamiliar.”