After 2½ years, the Kenney administration and Philadelphia’s police union, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5, are about to go back to the negotiating table.
But this time, in a conversation that’s bound to divide the city’s progressive left, a group of community organizers is turning the contract negotiations — which generally come and go without much public acknowledgment — into a fight for more police accountability.
“Every time we looked at an issue with regard to policing, it seemed to come back to the contract," said the Rev. Mark Kelly Tyler, pastor at Mother Bethel A.M.E. Church, who is leading the campaign through the interfaith organization POWER. “If you’re talking about excessive use of force and issues of deescalation, well, that’s a contract issue. If you’re talking about bad cops being fired and miraculously getting their jobs back ... how does that happen? Well, they’re protected through the contract.”
Nearly three dozen groups, as well as eight of the 17 members of City Council, have signed a letter with recommendations to the mayor regarding what should be in the contract. At an event organized by advocates last week, Chief Defender Keir Bradford-Grey and District Attorney Larry Krasner urged Kenney to take the contract negotiations — as well as the appointment of a new police commissioner — as an opportunity to change a department that has long been marked by scandal.
The city and the FOP, which represents 6,000 officers, have declined to comment on their aims for the contract. Contracts typically run for three years.
How common is it to fight for change in the police through a union contract? Why is it such a touchy subject on the left? And could activists succeed?
We’ve got those answers.
The advocates’ main recommendations include:
Changing the rules around grievance arbitration will likely be the biggest battle, according to a WHYY report.
In Philadelphia, it’s unusual for a group of advocates to target the police contract, since, as Billy Penn’s Max Marin noted, the pacts have historically been “negotiated behind closed doors — and without much fanfare.”
But these activists are part of a growing trend in police accountability that has roots in the Black Lives Matter movement.
This fall, advocates in Portland, Ore., and Minneapolis took up similar campaigns, calling for their elected officials to take a tougher stance in contract negotiations on a variety of issues. And last year, advocates in Austin, Texas, succeeded in getting a stronger police oversight office as part of contract negotiations. It’s been held up as an example of what activists can win in these kinds of fights.
Activists are focusing on these contracts because of a realization that “you can win whatever policy victory you want at the ground level, and all that can easily be undone by collective bargaining," said Hiram Rivera, executive director of the Community Resource Hub for Safety and Accountability, which provides support to groups doing police reform work. (Rivera’s organization is not currently working on the Philly campaign.)
But it’s still a fledgling movement, he said, and there’s no playbook.
Plus, there’s a lack of knowledge around the collective bargaining process that makes it difficult to design a successful campaign.
When it comes to police contracts, activists "don’t even know what to ask, because none of us even knows how to read those things,” he said.
Out of the nearly three dozen groups that signed the letter to Kenney about the contract, none are labor unions. Labor is hesitant to throw support behind any effort to influence a collective bargaining agreement, fearing that it could open their own contracts to such influence.
Pat Eiding, president of the Philadelphia AFL-CIO, said advocates were “overstepping their bounds" by attempting to influence the contract.
“That’s between the employer and the workers,” he said. “It’s sacrosanct in that area, and that’s where it belongs.”
Tyler, of POWER, said he’s “100% behind unions and the right to organize," pointing out that he and his organization have marched alongside Philadelphia’s unions. But the FOP, he said, doesn’t operate like a union.
“It operates like a political party,” he said. “As such, I don’t think we ought to treat them in the same ways we treat all other unions.”
Rivera said the question at the heart of this debate is: Are cops workers?
And yet, police were breaking strikes and protecting strikebreakers during the period of labor unrest in the late 19th century.
“You end up in this Catch-22," Rivera said, “where on the one end, cops can be seen as workers in the context of labor, but in practice, they’re actually enemies of workers.”
It’s going to be a tough battle.
Rivera, who formerly led the student organizing group Philadelphia Student Union, said that successful campaigns require strong community organizing, which Philadelphia has historically lacked. Much of the organizing in the city is through unions.
And he questioned if Philadelphia’s elected officials would be willing to take on the FOP. Politicians generally aren’t willing to take on the police for fear of being portrayed as standing against them, he said. And police unions have a pattern of attacking those who criticize them.
Tyler said elected officials seem to be afraid of taking on the FOP, but with Kenney in his last term as mayor, he hopes the mayor swings for the fences.