What a pro-worker Republican Party really looks like | Opinion

The day after the election, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, a rising star of conservative populism, declared: “Republicans in Washington are going to have a very hard time processing this. But the future is clear: We must be a working-class party, not a Wall Street party.”

Hawley is right that the Republican Party should become a pro-worker party. But continuing to embrace Donald Trump’s populist policies and bromides will work against that goal. Instead, Republican pro-worker policies should advance traditional conservative commitments to free markets and opportunity.

» READ MORE: Philly’s protection of workers’ rights doesn’t make business an underdog | Opinion

Many in the GOP, including potential 2024 presidential aspirants like Hawley and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, have apparently concluded that the key to taking back the White House is to stick to the Trumpian formula. According to this view, the president would have won reelection if it hadn’t been for the coronavirus pandemic, thanks to the strong pre-virus economy. After all, Trump won millions more votes in 2020 than in 2016. The GOP gained seats in the House of Representatives, will likely keep control of the Senate, maintained its grip on state legislatures, and increased its support among Black and Hispanic voters.

Liberals point out that a lot of the populist pro-worker rhetoric on the right is just that: rhetoric. They are largely correct. The problem with Rubio’s and Hawley’s interpretation of the election results is simple: Trump did scant for workers during his four years as president.

His 2017 corporate tax cut will eventually raise workers’ wages, but his destructive trade war worked against that by depressing investment spending. Moreover, the trade war not only hurt the overall economy; it also hit manufacturing workers specifically by reducing employment in that sector. The promised manufacturing rebirth never came, and significant progress on reducing drug prices or strengthening health care for workers did not occur.

As for Hawley, his Trumpian populism is most evident in his insistence that the working and middle classes have not seen improvement in their economic outcomes for decades, efforts to break up major technology companies, attacks on international institutions, and attempts to curtail free trade and impose heavy-handed drug pricing regulation.

Thus far, Rubio’s moves toward populism have been more restrained than Hawley’s, but he has openly endorsed the “need for a sweeping pro-America industrial policy,” criticized Wall Street, and courted organized labor. Both Hawley and Rubio have joined Trump and congressional Democrats over the past few weeks in supporting the measure to send checks for up to $2,000 per person to nearly all households.

I’m all for the GOP placing workers in the center of its policy agenda. But the party’s current populist agenda is not focused on workers, and much of it would actually hurt them. Moreover, it does not reflect conservatives’ commitments to free markets and personal responsibility, which are both right on the merits and popular among Republican voters.

» READ MORE: A less-racist brand of Trump populism could bring a GOP dynasty unless Dems do something | Will Bunch

Republican leaders should start with a plan to repair the damage caused by the pandemic recession. The number of workers unemployed for six months or longer has increased every month since April, more than quadrupling over that time. Rather than offering months of extra unemployment benefits, the federal government should pick up part of the tab to help them move from high unemployment areas to parts of the country with better job prospects. In addition, to fight poverty and increase workforce participation, Republicans should champion the expansion of the earned-income tax credit.

Both of these policies use government power to advance economic opportunity while acknowledging that we all should earn our own success in the labor market. Republicans should also aggressively roll back barriers to employment like occupational licenses and safety-net programs such as disability insurance that discourage employment.

Conservative populists want to use policy to prop up the manufacturing industry, pining for a return to an imagined past. But a conservative pro-worker agenda would look to the future with confidence, recognizing that the same market forces reducing manufacturing’s share of employment are giving rise to new middle-class occupations, and would help workers capitalize on those opportunities.

» READ MORE: The 10 most important figures in Philadelphia labor in 2020

A pro-worker conservative agenda should also include investments in job training programs that have shown promise. Work-based learning programs, like apprenticeships, harness market forces to determine what enrollees in job training programs are taught. This agenda should also expand opportunities for the formerly incarcerated to get jobs, including through reforms like “ban the box,” which regulate questions about criminal history on job applications.

These are all ideas that Republicans should be proud to embrace; to his credit, Sen. Rubio has been a leader on many of them. But the party should recognize that wrapping its arms around Trumpian populism will not help workers.

Michael R. Strain is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, where this piece first appeared. He is the director of economic policy studies and the Arthur F. Burns scholar in political economy at the American Enterprise Institute.