They clear vacant lots, run free after-school programs, and act as guardians for neighborhoods hard hit by the opioid crisis.
But a coalition of city workers — both union and nonunion — says there are ways the city can address its revenue shortfall and avoid layoffs. The workers have launched #NoServicesNoCity: Campaign for a Just Philly Budget, calling for Kenney and City Council to implement measures that will collect money from bigger businesses, major nonprofits, and wealthy individuals. Slashing city services, they say, will hurt Philadelphia’s poorest and most vulnerable during a time when people are already struggling with massive job losses and a public health crisis.
“The mayor needs to increase service, not cut it,” said Iliyaas Muhammad, who cleans and seals abandoned houses for the city’s Department of Licenses and Inspections. (His unit is not currently slated for cuts.)
Elected officials — from Kenney to City Controller Rebecca Rhynhart to Councilmember Isaiah Thomas — have proposed plans to recoup revenue lost during the pandemic. Still, the #NoServicesNoCity campaign is noteworthy because it’s led by the workers, who are also Philadelphia residents who stand to be affected by service cuts.
“This will affect the city all the way around,” said Muhammad, 54, who lives in Overbrook. “Trash pickups, the parks, our libraries.”
The workers propose:
The proposals are, for the most part, feasible, though they would require some legal finesse, experts say. The bigger question is whether they are politically feasible.
They would have to be approved by the mayor and City Council. And the city’s business community would likely not be in favor.
The city cannot legally levy a higher tax on bigger businesses than smaller businesses, said tax lawyer Stewart Weintraub. An increase in the gross receipts tax or an end to the property tax abatement would have to be applied across the board.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court found the personal property tax, essentially a tax on the wealthy that Philadelphia ended in 1997, to be unconstitutional in 2000 because it exempted the value of stocks from local businesses. The city could, however, find a state statute that allowed it to impose this tax in a way that didn’t violate that decision, Weintraub said. Such a statute exists, he added.
The city could find a way to impose PILOTs on big nonprofits, but it would have to challenge their federal status as a charitable institution exempt from property taxes. Philadelphia has been called an “outlier" for not pursuing PILOTs by Adam Langley, who studies tax exemptions at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a Massachusetts-based think tank.
“Large universities and medical institutions are crucial to the city’s employment and long-term financial health,” said Kenney spokesperson Mike Dunn, citing the city’s “limited” ability to impose PILOTs on them.
Dunn also said that “multiple tax reform commissions have advised the city that increasing [the gross receipts tax] hurts the city’s competitiveness and negatively impacts the city’s long-term growth."