Eagles linebackers are especially eager to turn the page | Early Birds
Nate Gerry said the Eagles need to say goodbye to Sunday's loss, in a particularly vivid way.
By Wednesday, you could tell the Eagles were tired of trying to explain what happened Sunday in that awful 37-19 loss to the Rams. That’s understandable; in the NFL, Wednesday is the day a team officially turns its attention to the coming game. But it seems players and coaches are even more eager for this after an embarrassing loss.
More along those lines in a moment, but first, if you like what you’re reading, tell your friends it’s free to sign up here. I want to know what you think, what we should add, and what you want to read, so send me feedback by email or on Twitter @lesbowen. (Twitter is a better bet; that email address gets spammed to death.)
— Les Bowen (email@example.com)
Looking a little flushed
At the epicenter of the Eagles' defensive collapse against the Rams was a linebacking corps that got trampled by the run game and left in the dust by Jared Goff’s short passing game.
“Just as a whole, we all played inconsistent football,” linebacker Nate Gerry said Wednesday. “Defensively, we couldn’t put a good drive together.”
A team that prides itself on stopping the run gave up 191 rushing yards on 39 carries.
“Each series there were people here, people there [who made mistakes], but obviously, when they run the ball on you very well, it should go on the linebackers,” Gerry said. “We take pride in stopping the run here in Philadelphia, and that’s what we didn’t do.”
Gerry said that after discussing the breakdowns and watching the film, “you’ve just got to flush it.”
He said this is easier when you know the season is still salvageable.
“It’s easier for us to flush it knowing we still have the objectives and goals ahead of us that we still want to accomplish. … It’s just one of the bumps in the road. … I feel like we learned from it, and especially after today’s practice, I feel like we’ve definitely flushed it.”
What you need to know about the Eagles
The Eagles' first-round rookie, Jalen Reagor, was watching practice from the sideline Wednesday, and won’t get back on the field for several weeks after tearing a ligament in his thumb. EJ Smith has the story.
Marcus Hayes tells us how the Eagles can save their season and their coach. You’ll want to take notes.
What is it really like being Carson Wentz right now? The writer of this piece sure would like to know.
Noted cinephile Jeff McLane has examined the film from Sunday’s loss, and he has some good news.
The pending Jalen Reagor thumb surgery wasn’t the only bad Eagles injury news Wednesday.
From the mailbag
What previous year does this remind you of? — @sanglamore, via Twitter.
Interesting question. Two weeks in is early for comparisons. I was only in my second year covering the team in 2003, and I’ve never forgotten all the conclusions that were jumped to when that team went to Buffalo in Week 3 carrying an 0-2 record. The Eagles won that week, despite crippling injuries, and finished 12-4.
I don’t think this team will go 12-4. I’m reluctant to say disaster looms, as weak as the NFC East again seems to be. But after back-to-back 9-7 seasons, we might see a fade back into 7-9, 6-10.
Maybe it feels a little like 2015, given that then, too, expectations were for a solid season, after back-to-back 10-6 years under Chip Kelly. An 0-2 start showed that many offseason assumptions were untrue, such as believing that Byron Maxwell was a shutdown corner, and that DeMarco Murray was better suited for Kelly’s system than LeSean McCoy. Despite never really looking like a contender, that team hung around at 4-4 until it hit a trio of ugly losses to the Dolphins, the Bucs and the Lions. Eventually, you could tell there was more wrong than a lack of talent. You could tell those guys were not playing for their coach.
That certainly hasn’t happened here yet. But given how tough the schedule gets after Cincinnati, anything is possible. Except 12-4, like in 2003. That isn’t happening.