Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

It didn’t need to take that long: What Pennsylvania’s election could have looked like with earlier counting

There are multiple reasons the full picture of Pennsylvania’s results took longer to emerge than in other large battleground states this year, but one stands out.

Workers processing mail ballots at the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia on Nov. 6.
Workers processing mail ballots at the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia on Nov. 6.Read moreYONG KIM / Staff Photographer

Polls had been closed in Florida for only a few hours last month when elections offices started closing up shop for the night, too.

Almost all the votes were counted and reported, and there just wasn’t much left to do at that moment. News organizations had already projected President Donald Trump as the state’s winner. Things in Tampa, for example, shut down by 1 a.m., the county supervisor of elections said.

In Philadelphia, meanwhile, elections officials weren’t even halfway through a 50-hour stretch without sleep, at the start of an around-the-clock vote counting process that would continue for days.

“I wanted to take a 12-hour break to let people get some sleep, and it was just impossible,” said Lisa Deeley, Philadelphia’s chief elections official. “And there was no way I would be able to get away with that, because the sky would fall, and all anybody wanted was for us to keep counting.”

It wasn’t until Saturday, four days after Election Day, that enough Pennsylvania votes had been counted for news organizations to declare that Joe Biden had won the state — and with it, the presidency. The long wait created an opening for false claims of fraud that Trump and his supporters have exploited.

There are multiple reasons the full picture of Pennsylvania’s results took longer to emerge than in other large battleground states this year, but one stands out: Pennsylvania doesn’t allow mail ballots to be opened until Election Day.

» READ MORE: The months-long political saga that guaranteed a long vote count in Pennsylvania

That prohibition was the major factor for the timing of Pennsylvania’s vote count, elections officials and experts said, and an Inquirer analysis of results reported by the Associated Press shows other large battleground states that began counting ballots earlier reported their results much sooner.

By the time officials in Florida went home that night, they’d already been counting mail ballots for more than three weeks. Less than two hours after the close of polls, the state reported more than 95% of its presidential votes. North Carolina began counting votes more than a month before Election Day and reported more than 95% of its votes by 11 p.m. that night.

Similarly, Texas and Ohio began processing votes before Election Day and reported more than 90% of their presidential results by the time it was midnight in Pennsylvania.

The wait for results was a direct result of Pennsylvania policies, and a bipartisan cast of county elections officials had urged lawmakers to allow them to begin opening ballots earlier to avoid it. But negotiations between the Republicans who control the state legislature and Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, fell apart in the weeks leading up to Election Day, with Republicans ultimately turning away pleas to allow what’s known as “pre-canvassing.”

Elections are complex affairs, with a web of policies that makes every state — and every county — different. Florida and Texas, for example, didn’t just count mail ballots before Election Day, they also had robust in-person early voting that allowed votes to be quickly tallied. And while this was Pennsylvania’s first year allowing all voters to use mail ballots, other states have built their mail voting infrastructure over multiple elections.

But processing ballots before Election Day is the clear through line when looking at key states across the country that counted their votes before Pennsylvania, said Charles Stewart, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who is a national expert in quantitative measures of election administration.

“You have these other really big states ... they’re dumping results within 15 minutes of the polls’ close and they’re already 75% of the way there in half an hour,” Stewart said. “It’s a pretty straightforward argument to make.”

» READ MORE: Philly elections officials are getting death threats as Trump targets the city

This year, though, Trump and his allies have refused to acknowledge his loss, instead peddling conspiracy theories that are untethered to ed is a result of both how long it takes to count the votes and when it begins. In other states, it may take the same amount of time, but stretching that over several weeks meant avoiding the kind of all-hands-on-deck rush that Pennsylvania saw.

“Everything would be normal,” Stewart said, “rather than an emergency.”

News organizations’ race calls are unofficial declarations, based on sophisticated statistical modeling and on-the-ground reporting. By the time votes are certified, voters and candidates have usually long since accepted the results.

This year, though, Trump and his allies have refused to acknowledge his loss, instead peddling increasingly far-fetched conspiracy theories that are untethered to the facts; suing to try to overturn the election results in several states, including Pennsylvania, racking up a string of court losses; unsuccessfully urging state lawmakers to pursue a radical and legally murky scheme to appoint Trump electors in contravention of the popular vote; and baselessly claiming fraud without providing any evidence in court.

» READ MORE: Fact-checking false claims about Pennsylvania and the presidential election

It’s impossible to know how events would have played out in an alternative world in which Pennsylvania counted enough ballots for Biden’s victory to be declared in the hours after voting ended. But it’s clear that the long vote count created a window for mis- and disinformation, with lies and false claims spreading quickly based on a flawed understanding of the counting process.

Because Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to vote by mail, for example — in large part due to Trump’s false attacks on the method — Pennsylvania saw what’s known as a “blue shift.” Trump had a strong majority of the partial vote count on election night that slowly eroded as mail ballots were counted.

Early that Wednesday, Trump declared he had an insurmountable lead in Pennsylvania — a flatly untrue claim. Trump and his supporters have pointed to the blue shift as a sign of fraud, even though it is instead simply a result of the time it takes to count mail ballots and the partisan skew in who used those ballots.

“These patterns in the count were really easy to spin into a malicious narrative,” said William T. Adler, election technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based civil liberties nonprofit focused on technology and the Internet.

» READ MORE: The Philadelphia suburbs were the key to Joe Biden’s Pennsylvania victory. Here are the numbers.

A similar twisting of reality occurred with the very counting and reporting of ballots: The state’s largest counties counted ballots around the clock, reporting them in batches, but conspiracy theorists now point to those reports as signs of fraud, saying there is something suspicious in what they describe as “vote spikes” and “ballot dumps.” In reality, numbers change as votes are counted, and votes are reported in batches because that is far more efficient than reporting one vote at a time. And those numbers broke strongly for Biden because it was the largest, most Democratic counties that took the longest to report their votes.

As a result, 95% of votes for Trump were counted and reported by 11 p.m. that Wednesday, 27 hours after voting ended. It took 34 more hours before 95% of Biden’s votes were reported, by 9 a.m. that Friday.

In Florida, where mail voting has been a major part of elections for years, state law allows election officials to open and scan mail ballots starting 22 days before Election Day. Officials in some of the state’s largest counties said that allowed them to count ballots without the kind of intense pressure Pennsylvania was under.

“By the time we got to Election Day, we were caught up with everything that had come to our office,” said Craig Latimer, supervisor of elections for Tampa’s Hillsborough County and head of Florida’s professional association of county elections officials.

Hillsborough County had nearly 338,000 mail ballots, total. Philadelphia had nearly 375,000.

Because there was no backlog, Latimer said, on election night the only mail ballots he had left to count were those his office received shortly before polls closed, such as in the final pickups from drop boxes.

When polls closed in Hillsborough County, Latimer had only about 3,500 mail ballots left to count.

In Philadelphia, officials had almost 300,000 to go.

“I can’t imagine if I had to wait until Election Day to do that and then the army of people I would need,” Latimer said.

» READ MORE: From hanging chads to deadlocks, presidential elections that took weeks and months to decide

In Broward County, staffers stayed on top of the ballots received every day, with no backlog, and staffing could increase as the daily work grew, said county elections spokesperson Steven Vancore.

“We had plenty of time to prepare and adapt, and the adaption is what’s wonderful,” he said.

Deeley, the chair of the Philadelphia City Commissioners, said she hopes legislators will change the law to allow counties to count ballots before Election Day.

“All of us should want it to be the most efficient, most effective process available, and the pre-canvass is just a common-sense solution,” she said. “It gives people extra confidence in the process. ... It should never be partisan bickering, it should be looked at through a common-sense lens. And, really, it should be a no-brainer.”

Staff writer Chris A. Williams contributed to this article.